T 1969/08 (Touch screen with layered structure/TAIGUEN) du 07.06.2011
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T196908.20110607
- Date de la décision
- 7 juin 2011
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1969/08
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 02771991.3
- Classe de la CIB
- G06F 3/033
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- A touch control display screen with a built-in electromagnet induction layer of septum array grids
- Nom du demandeur
- Taiguen Technology (Shen_zhen) Co., Ltd., et al
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.5.05
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 106European Patent Convention Art 107European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 113(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention Art 97(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art (4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(6)
- Mots-clés
- Sole request filed after summons for oral proceedings returns to subjet-matter abandoned during first-instance proceedings
Non-attendance at oral proceedings
Diverging request prima facie clearly allowable (no)
Sole request admissible (no) - Exergue
- If a feature objected to as "obscure" by the examining division and omitted from all requests subsequently filed by the applicant is then re-introduced in the claims filed one month before oral proceedings during the appeal proceedings without commenting on the objection raised earlier against this feature, the board may refuse to admit these claims into the proceedings at its discretion under Article 12(4) RPBA.
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.