T 0128/10 du 10.12.2010
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T012810.20101210
- Date de la décision
- 10 décembre 2010
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0128/10
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 96114753.5
- Classe de la CIB
- G06K 7/06
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- IC card reader with audio output
- Nom du demandeur
- Gemalto SA
- Nom de l'opposant
- Molnia, David
- Chambre
- 3.4.01
- Sommaire
I. According to Rule 22 EPC in conjunction with Rule 85 EPC, the procedural requirements to be fulfilled for recording the transfer of a European patent in the European Patent Register consist in the filing of a request of the interested party, the production of documents providing evidence of the transfer, and the payment of an administrative fee. These requirements do not need to be fulfilled at the same time. If they are met on different dates, the transfer shall only have effect vis-à-vis the EPO at the date on which all the requirements mentioned above are fulfilled (Reasons, 3.5).
II. If an appellant declares that it was its true intention to file an appeal on behalf of its name, there is no deficiency in the notice of appeal concerning the name of the appellant which may be remedied in accordance with Rule 99(1)(a) EPC in conjunction with Rule 101(2) EPC (in agreement with T 97/98) nor an error which may be corrected pursuant to Rule 139, first sentence, EPC (Reasons, 5.4).
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)European Patent Convention R 101(2)European Patent Convention R 139European Patent Convention R 22European Patent Convention R 99(1)(a)
- Mots-clés
- -
- Exergue
- -
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible