T 0450/13 du 24.03.2015
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2015:T045013.20150324
- Date de la décision
- 24 mars 2015
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0450/13
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 07254468.7
- Classe de la CIB
- C09J 7/02
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Emulsion based adhesive
- Nom du demandeur
- ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY
- Nom de l'opposant
- Synthomer Deutschland GmbH
- Chambre
- 3.3.09
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention Art 83European Patent Convention R 99(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
- Mots-clés
- Sufficiency (yes)
Novelty (yes)
Inventive step (yes)
Admissibility of public prior use
Admissibility of new novelty attack
Admissibility of new inventive step attack - Exergue
- 1. Submitting new documents together with the statement of grounds of appeal without discussing them may obscure any argument the appellant may have intended to make in the statement of grounds of appeal.
It is in particular not acceptable if it is then necessary for the board and any other party to read the new documents, to identify the possibly relevant passages in them and then to knit them together to understand why, in view of these documents, the decision of the opposition division was in the appellant's view wrong (see in particular point 4.4 of the Reasons).
2. Not substantiating a public prior use in opposition proceedings but attempting to substantiate it in the statement of grounds of appeal may lead to the inadmissibility of this attack under Article 12(4) RPBA (see point 3 of the Reasons).
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.