European Patent Office

T 0232/14 (Method and apparatus for identifying, authenticating, tracking and tracing manufactured items/INEXTO SA) du 06.10.2020

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T023214.20201006
Date de la décision
6 octobre 2020
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0232/14
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
09722519.7
Classe de la CIB
G06Q 30/00
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING, AUTHENTICATING, TRACKING AND TRACING MANUFACTURED ITEMS
Nom du demandeur
INEXTO SA
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.5.01
Sommaire
-
Mots-clés
Inventive step - determining ranges of unit identifiers (no
Inventive step - not technical and obvious)
Inventive step - technical effect of saving storage (no
Inventive step - bonus effect)
Appeal decision - remittal to the department of first instance (no)
Exergue
The Board judges that using ranges of unit identifiers to label a number of (consecutive) unit identifiers of manufactured items is, at the level of generality at which it is claimed, on the business side of the line between technical and non-technical subject-matter (see e.g. T 144/11 - Security rating System / SATO MICHIHIRO, points 2.1, and 3.6 to 3.9).(See point 2.5 of the reasons)
The ranges of unit identifiers do have a meaning for the business person. They correspond to batches of units produced on a production line. (See point 2.6 of the reasons)
Even if the "determining of ranges of unit identifiers" achieved a technical effect, such as reducing data storage and data bandwidth requirements, it is a matter of routine design for the skilled person, a software programmer or a database expert, based on common general knowledge to store the first and the last element of a list of items, instead of the whole list. (See point 2.9 of the reasons)
Affaires citantes
-

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.