T 0144/11 (Security rating System / SATO MICHIHIRO) du 14.08.2018
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2018:T014411.20180814
- Date de la décision
- 14 août 2018
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0144/11
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 03012362.4
- Classe de la CIB
- G06F 17/60
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Security rating system
- Nom du demandeur
- Sato, Michihiro
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.5.01
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 56
- Mots-clés
- Inventive step - objective calculation of the safety rating of an investment (no
Inventive step - part of business requirement)
Inventive step - including count of transmissions of rating information in the rating (no
Inventive step - obvious implementation of business requirement)
Inventive step - technical prejudice in the art (no) - Exergue
- A problem of the type "implement [the business requirement]" will normally never lead to an allowable claim. Either the implementation will be obvious or have no technical effect, or if not, the implementation will have a technical effect that can be used to reformulate the problem essentially to "achieve [the effect of the implementation]".
However, the implementation-type problem is just a starting point that might have to be modified when the implementation is considered. It helps when a technical problem is not apparent at the outset. Examining the business requirements carefully and correctly establishing what is to be implemented ensures that all technical matter arising from the idea of the invention and its implementation is taken into account for inventive step (see point 2.7).
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.