T 0384/91 (Conflict) du 11.11.1992

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence

ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T038491.19921111

Date de la décision

11 novembre 1992

Numéro de l'affaire

T 0384/91

Requête en révision de

Numéro de la demande

82306422.5

Classe de la CIB

G02B 5/00 B29D 11/00

Langue de la procédure

Anglais

Distribution

Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)

Téléchargement

Versions JO

Autres décisions pour cet affaire

T 0384/91 Conflit entre les paragraphs 2 et 3 de l'art.123 EPC 1994-09-27 T 0384/91 Kollision zwischen Artikel 123, Absatz 2 u. 3 EPÜ 1994-09-27 T 0384/91 Conflict between Article 123, paragraphs 2 and 3,EPC 1994-09-27 T 0384/91 "Conflict" between Article 123, paragraphs (2) and (3), EPC 1994-09-27

Résumés pour cette décision

Titre de la demande

Method for the manufacture of a thin optical membrane

Nom du demandeur

ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR

Nom de l'opposant

Mitsui

Chambre

3.4.02

Sommaire

The following point of law is referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:

If a European patent as granted contains subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed and also limits the scope of protection conferred by the claims, is it possible during the opposition proceedings to maintain the patent in view of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 123 EPC?

Dispositions juridiques pertinentes

European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 123(3) 1973

Mots-clés

Conflicting requirements of Article 123, paragraphs 2 and 3, EPC
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal

Exergue

Affaires citées

Affaires citantes

T 0384/91 T 0911/92 T 0112/95 T 0064/96 T 0173/96 T 0101/97 T 1066/98 T 0220/99 T 1004/01 T 0412/04 T 0210/08 T 0824/08 T 1650/08 T 2202/08 T 2230/08 T 1779/09 T 1595/11 T 0418/12

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The following point of law is referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:

"If a European patent as granted contains subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed and also limits the scope of protection conferred by the claims, is it possible during the opposition proceedings to maintain the patent in view of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 1 23 EPC?"