European Patent Office

T 0873/94 (Amended divisional application) du 10.07.1996

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T087394.19960710
Date de la décision
10 juilliet 1996
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0873/94
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
89116770.2
Classe de la CIB
H01L 27/11
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Semiconductor device
Nom du demandeur
TOSHIBA
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.4.01
Sommaire

I. A divisional application has to comply with the requirements of both Article 76(1) EPC and Article 123(2) EPC. Article 76(1) EPC governs the filing of a divisional application and therefore whether it is entitled to the filing date of the parent application and has the same benefit of right to priority as the parent application. Article 123(2) EPC governs amendments to the divisional application subsequent to its filing.

II. Where a proposal for amendment of an application involves the addition of a limiting feature to a claim, application of a "novelty test" is not appropriate to determine whether or not the amendment complies with Article 123(2) EPC, because as explained in Decision G 1/93 (OJ EPO 1994, 541), "Whether or not the adding of an undisclosed feature limiting the scope of protection...would be contrary to the purpose of Article 123(2) EPC...depends on the circumstances".

Mots-clés
Feature added to claim of divisional application
Amended claimed combination within protection claimed in parent and divisional application as filed
Subject-matter extending beyond the content of the earlier and divisional application as filed (no)
Exergue
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. Claims 1 to 3 which make up the main request do not contravene the requirements of Articles 76(1) and 123(2) EPC.

3. The case is remitted to the first instance for further examination as to whether the application meets the requirements of the EPC.