T 0850/95 (Correction of decision to grant) du 21.11.1995
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1995:T085095.19951121
- Date de la décision
- 21 novembre 1995
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0850/95
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 89311913.1
- Classe de la CIB
- C04B 11/024
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- T 0850/95 Correction of decision to grant 1996-07-12T 0850/95 Berichtigung des Erteilungsbeschlusses 1996-07-12T 0850/95 Rectification de la décision de délivrance 1996-07-12T 0850/95 Correction of decision to grant/US GYPSUM III 1996-07-12
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Composite material and method of producing
- Nom du demandeur
- US GYPSUM
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.02
- Sommaire
The following question of law shall be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal under Article 112(1)(a) EPC: Are appeals from a decision of an examining division refusing a request under Rule 89 EPC for correction of the decision to grant to be decided upon by a technical board of appeal (Article 21(3)(a) and (b) EPC) or by the Legal Board of Appeal (Article 21(3)(c) EPC)?
If the answer dependings on the circumstances of the case, who shall decide on the competence?
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 21(3) 1973European Patent Convention R 89 1973
- Mots-clés
- Competence of the boards of appeal
Refusal of a correction of the decision to grant - Exergue
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The following question of law shall be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal under Article 112(1)(a) EPC:
Are appeals from a decision of an examining division refusing a request under Rule 89 EPC for correction of the decision to grant to be decided upon by a technical board of appeal (Article 21(3)(a) and (b) EPC) or by the Legal Board of Appeal (Article 21(3)(c) EPC)?
If the answer depends on the circumstances of the case, who shall decide on the competence?