R 0005/16 (Petition clearly unallowable) vom 24.10.2016
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2016:R000516.20161024
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 24. Oktober 2016
- Aktenzeichen
- R 0005/16
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- T 0403/13 2015-10-06
- Anmeldenummer
- 07700163.4
- IPC-Klasse
- A61L 24/08
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- LAYERED ADHESIVE CONSTRUCTION WITH ADHESIVE LAYERS HAVING DIFFERENT HYDROCOLLOID COMPOSITION
- Name des Antragstellers
- Coloplast A/S
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Hollister Incorporated
- Kammer
- -
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 100(a)European Patent Convention Art 100(b)European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)European Patent Convention Art 112a(4)European Patent Convention Art 113(1)European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention Art 83European Patent Convention R 106European Patent Convention R 107European Patent Convention R 109(2)(a)Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 13Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 14(2)
- Schlagwörter
- Fundamental violation of the right to be heard (no)
- Orientierungssatz
- A party to appeal proceedings should be aware of the methodology established in the case law of the boards of appeal for examining inventive step and should be prepared to submit its relevant arguments in this respect (Reasons, point 18).
A mere subjective surprise of a party in respect of an issue in the reasoning of the decision under review, which the party objectively could have known and on which the party was given an opportunity to comment, does not in itself amount to a violation of Article 113(1) EPC (Reasons, point 19).
Order
The Enlarged Board of Appeal as composed under Rule 109(2)(a) EPC unanimously decides:
The petition for review is rejected as clearly unallowable.