R 0002/14 (Fundamental violation of the right to be heard) vom 22.04.2016
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2016:R000214.20160422
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 22. April 2016
- Aktenzeichen
- R 0002/14
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 99965105.2
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- R 0002/14 Objections to the Chairman and Members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal 2015-02-17
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Desaturases and methods of using them for synthesis of polyunsaturated fatty acids
- Name des Antragstellers
- Washington State University
- Name des Einsprechenden
- E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company
- Kammer
- -
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 100(b)European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)European Patent Convention Art 112a(4)European Patent Convention Art 113(1)European Patent Convention Art 24(4)European Patent Convention Art 83European Patent Convention R 106European Patent Convention R 107European Patent Convention R 108(3)European Patent Convention R 109(2)(a)European Patent Convention R 109(2)(b)European Patent Convention R 110European Patent Convention R 115(2)Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 13Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 14(2)Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 14(4)
- Schlagwörter
- Petition admissible (yes) obligation to raise objection (no)
Petition allowable (yes) remaining doubts as to whether the petitioners right to be heard was observed to be solved to the affected partys benefit
Decision under review set aside (yes)
Re-opening of proceedings (yes)
Replacement of members of the Board of Appeal (no) not requested and no ex officio exception from the general principle - Orientierungssatz
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under review is set aside.
2. The proceedings before the Board of Appeal 3.3.08 are reopened.
3. Reimbursement of the fee for the petition is ordered.