T 0384/91 (Conflict) vom 11.11.1992
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T038491.19921111
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 11. November 1992
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0384/91
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 82306422.5
- IPC-Klasse
- G02B 5/00B29D 11/00
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- -
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- T 0384/91 Conflit entre les paragraphs 2 et 3 de l'art.123 EPC 1994-09-27T 0384/91 Kollision zwischen Artikel 123, Absatz 2 u. 3 EPÜ 1994-09-27T 0384/91 Conflict between Article 123, paragraphs 2 and 3,EPC 1994-09-27T 0384/91 "Conflict" between Article 123, paragraphs (2) and (3), EPC 1994-09-27
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Method for the manufacture of a thin optical membrane
- Name des Antragstellers
- ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Mitsui
- Kammer
- 3.4.02
- Leitsatz
The following point of law is referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:
If a European patent as granted contains subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed and also limits the scope of protection conferred by the claims, is it possible during the opposition proceedings to maintain the patent in view of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 123 EPC?
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 123(3) 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Conflicting requirements of Article 123, paragraphs 2 and 3, EPC
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The following point of law is referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:
"If a European patent as granted contains subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed and also limits the scope of protection conferred by the claims, is it possible during the opposition proceedings to maintain the patent in view of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 1 23 EPC?"