3. Petition for review under Article 112a EPC
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. B. Proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal
  7. 3. Petition for review under Article 112a EPC
  8. 3.7. Obligation to raise objections
  9. 3.7.3 Written form to avoid uncertainties
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3.7. Obligation to raise objections

Overview

3.7.3 Written form to avoid uncertainties

In the light of the purpose of the obligation to raise objections, the board in T 1690/22 considered that raising an objection in writing was a practice making it possible to clearly determine its scope. Although it made no difference to the objection's substance whether it was raised in writing or merely verbally, doing so in writing made it possible to record verifiably what the board had had to decide on and avoid uncertainties in any review proceedings about how the party raising the objection had intended to formulate it. See also in this chapter V.B.3.7.5.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility