3. Petition for review under Article 112a EPC
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. B. Proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal
  7. 3. Petition for review under Article 112a EPC
  8. 3.7. Obligation to raise objections
  9. 3.7.4 Examples of invalid objections
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3.7. Obligation to raise objections

Overview

3.7.4 Examples of invalid objections

The following are examples of acts that the respective boards have found did not qualify as an objection under R. 106 EPC:

– contesting insufficiency of disclosure or offering new documents (R 7/08)

– requesting that a late-filed document not be admitted into the proceedings (R 9/09, R 17/10)

– protesting against the hearing of an expert (R 2/11)

– an objection against the board raising a new line of argument or a request for remittal or postponement (R 14/11)

– requesting that a board make a statement on the scope of a claim, the request being repeatedly refused (R 3/14)

– a statement (a remark) that failure to admit an auxiliary request would be a violation of the party’s right to be heard (R 6/22)

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility