J 0009/07 (Priority period and re-establishment/TOSHIBA) du 30.06.2008
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2008:J000907.20080630
- Date de la décision
- 30 juin 2008
- Numéro de l'affaire
- J 0009/07
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 04257544.9
- Classe de la CIB
- G01N 35/10
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Clinical laboratory apparatus
- Nom du demandeur
- 1. KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
2. Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation - Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.1.01
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 1 1973European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 122European Patent Convention Art 122(5) 1973European Patent Convention Art 2(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 66European Patent Convention Art 66 1973European Patent Convention Art 87 1973European Patent Convention Art 87(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 88 1973European Patent Convention Art 89 1973European Patent Convention R 136European Patent Convention R 38 1973European Patent Convention R 84a 1973European Patent Convention R 85 1973
- Mots-clés
- Request to refer a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - rejected
Request for re-establishment of rights with respect to the priority period - not admissible - Exergue
- Article 122 (5) EPC 1973 has to be interpreted in accordance with its proper wording and that wording leaves no doubt or ambiguity that restitutio in integrum with respect to the time limit referred to in Article 87 (1) EPC 1973 has been excluded by the legislator.
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request to refer a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is rejected.
2. The appeal is dismissed.