T 1007/01 (Intervention/EOS) du 27.10.2004
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2004:T100701.20041027
- Date de la décision
- 27 octobre 2004
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1007/01
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 96103986.4
- Classe de la CIB
- B29C 67/00
- Langue de la procédure
- Allemand
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en allemand
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- T 1007/01 2005-09-30
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objektes
- Nom du demandeur
- EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems
- Nom de l'opposant
- 3D Systems Inc.
- Chambre
- 3.2.05
- Sommaire
Under Article 112(1)(a) EPC the following points of law are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:
I. After withdrawal of the sole appeal, may the proceedings be continued with a third party who intervened during the appeal proceedings?
II. If the answer to question I is yes:
Is entitlement to continue the proceedings conditional on the intervener's compliance with formal requirements extending beyond the criteria for an admissible intervention explicitly laid down in Article 105 EPC; in particular, does the appeal fee have to be paid?
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 105 1973European Patent Convention Art 107 1973European Patent Convention Art 108 1973European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973
- Mots-clés
- Intervention in appeal proceedings
Continuation of proceedings after withdrawal of sole appeal
Referral to Enlarged Board of Appeal - Exergue
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
Under Article 112(1)(a) EPC the following points of law are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:
I. After withdrawal of the sole appeal, may the proceedings be continued with a third party who intervened during the appeal proceedings?
II. If the answer to question I is yes:
Is entitlement to continue the proceedings conditional on the intervener's compliance with formal requirements extending beyond the criteria for an admissible intervention explicitly laid down in Article 105 EPC; in particular, does the appeal fee have to be paid?