T 1286/23 du 11.11.2024
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2024:T128623.20241111
- Date de la décision
- 11 novembre 2024
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1286/23
- En ligne le
- 28 novembre 2024
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 14735118.3
- Classe de la CIB
- A47K 7/04A61H 23/02
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- T 1286/23 Intervention 2026-02-26
- Résumés pour cette décision
- Résumé de EPC2000 Art 107
- Titre de la demande
- SKIN CLEANSER
- Nom du demandeur
- FOREO LIMITED
- Nom de l'opposant
- Beurer GmbH
GESKE GmbH & Co. KG - Chambre
- 3.2.04
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- EPC2000_Art_107_(2007)_Sent_1EPC2000_Art_107_(2007)_Sent_2European Patent Convention Art 100European Patent Convention Art 104(1)European Patent Convention Art 104(3)European Patent Convention Art 105European Patent Convention Art 105(1)European Patent Convention Art 105(1)(a)European Patent Convention Art 105(1)(b)European Patent Convention Art 105(2)European Patent Convention Art 105(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 107European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 112(1)European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)European Patent Convention Art 112(3)European Patent Convention Art 61(1)European Patent Convention Art 97(3)European Patent Convention Art 99European Patent Convention Art 99(1)European Patent Convention R 25 1973European Patent Convention R 57(4) 1973European Patent Convention R 79(4)European Patent Convention R 89(1)European Patent Convention R 99(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 010(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 014Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 021
- Mots-clés
- -
- Exergue
- Under Article 112(1)(a) EPC and Article 21 RPBA the following points of law are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:
After withdrawal of all appeals, may the proceedings be continued with a third party who intervened during the appeal proceedings? In particular, may the third party acquire an appellant status corresponding to the status of a person entitled to appeal within the meaning of Article 107, first sentence, EPC?
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
Under Article 112(1)(a) EPC and Article 21 RPBA the following points of law are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:
After withdrawal of all appeals, may the proceedings be continued with a third party who intervened during the appeal proceedings? In particular, may the third party acquire an appellant status corresponding to the status of a person entitled to appeal within the meaning of Article 107, first sentence, EPC?