T 0862/16 (Connection re-establishment/HTC) du 02.03.2021
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2021:T086216.20210302
- Date de la décision
- 2 mars 2021
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0862/16
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 12004150.4
- Classe de la CIB
- H04W 76/02
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Methods for synchronizing PDCP operations after PRC connection re-establishment in a wireless communication system and related apparatuses thereof
- Nom du demandeur
- HTC Corporation
- Nom de l'opposant
- Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
- Chambre
- 3.5.03
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 111(1) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 113(1) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 114(1) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 123(3) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 23(3) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 23(4) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 76(1) (2007)European Patent Convention R 103(1)(a) (2007)European Patent Convention R 12c (2016)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 11 (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 23 (2020)
- Mots-clés
- Added subject-matter - main and auxiliary requests 1 to 10 (yes)
Admittance of auxiliary request 11 filed at oral proceedings (yes): exceptional circumstances
Added subject-matter - auxiliary request 11 (no, after amendments)
Extension of protection - auxiliary request 11 (no)
Objection introduced ex officio by the board - request for referral to Enlarged BoA (no)
Remittal to the opposition division for further prosecution
Remittal - (yes): novelty and inventive step not examined yet
Request for reimbursement of the appeal fee - (no): no substantial procedural violation - Exergue
- As to raising a new objection by a Board of Appeal ex officio under Article 114(1) EPC, see points 2.8 and 8 of the Reasons.
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request for referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is refused.
2. The decision under appeal is set aside.
3. The case is remitted to the opposition division for further prosecution.
4. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.