European Patent Office

T 0769/92 (General-purpose management system) du 31.05.1994

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:1994:T076992.19940531
Date de la décision
31 mai 1994
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0769/92
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
86110223.4
Classe de la CIB
G06F 15/21
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
General-purpose management system, method for operating said system and transfer slip
Nom du demandeur
Sohei
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.5.01
Sommaire

I. An invention comprising functional features implemented by software (computer programs) is not excluded from patentability under Article 52(2)(c), (3) EPC, if technical considerations concerning particulars of the solution of the problem the invention solves are required in order to carry out that same invention.

Such technical considerations lend a technical nature to the invention in that they imply a technical problem to be solved by (implicit) technical features.

An invention of this kind does not pertain to a computer program as such under Article 52(3).

II. Non-exclusion from patentability cannot be destroyed by an additional feature which as such would itself be excluded, as in the present case features referring to management systems and methods which may fall under the "methods for doing business" excluded from patentability under Article 52(2)(c), (3) EPC (following established case law according to which a mix of features, some of which are excluded under Article 52(2) and (3) EPC and some of which are not so excluded, may be patentable (in contrast to recent case law concerning inventions excluded by Article 52(4) EPC, cf. T 820/92 according to which one feature excluded under Article 52(4) EPC suffices for the whole claim to be excluded from patentability)).

Mots-clés
Non-exclusion from patentability - technical considerations to be regarded as resulting in a technical contribution to the art - no doing business as such - no computer programs as such - no presentation of information as such
Remittal for further prosecution
Exergue
-
Affaires citées
T 0026/86T 0038/86

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the first instance for further prosecution on the basis of the application documents according to the Appellant's main request (cf. point V), having regard to the above final remarks (points 4.1 to 4.4).