European Patent Office

T 0154/04 (Estimating sales activity / DUNS LICENSING ASSOCIATES) du 15.11.2006

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2006:T015404.20061115
Date de la décision
15 novembre 2006
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0154/04
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
94912949.8
Classe de la CIB
G06F 15/21
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Method of estimating product distribution
Nom du demandeur
DUNS LICENSING ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.5.01
Sommaire

I. Methods of business research are excluded "as such" from patentability under Article 52(2)(c) and (3) EPC.

II. Gathering and evaluating data as part of a business research method do not convey technical character to the business research method if such steps do not contribute to the technical solution of a technical problem.

Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(b) 1973European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 52(1)European Patent Convention Art 52(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 52(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 52(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 54 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973Judgement of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in re Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd (and others) and Macrossan´s Patent Application [2006] EWCA Civ 1371Judgement of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in re Genentech Inc.'s Patent [1989] R.P.C. 147Judgement of the German Federal Court of Justice X ZB 20/03 - elektronischer Zahlungsverkehr of 24 May 2004Judgement of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in re Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd (and others) and Macrossan´s Patent Application [2006] EWCA Civ 1371Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 16Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) Art 31
Mots-clés
Requirement of invention - method, main request (no)
Requirement of invention - method, auxiliary request 1 (yes)
Inventive step - system, main and auxiliary requests 1 to 3 (no)
Amendments - claim 1, auxiliary requests 4 and 5 (inadmissible)
Remittal for further prosecution (refused)
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (refused)
Exergue
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.