La jurisprudence des chambres de recours de l'OEB en 2017

Date de publication en ligne: 18.6.2018



Sommaires/exergues[ 1 ] des décisions de l'année 2017 publiées (ou dont la publication est prévue)

Case Number:

G 1/16 (Disclaimer III)


18 December 2017

Patent proprietor/Appellant:

The Trustees of Princeton University The University of Southern California


Merck Patent GmbH BASF SE


For the purpose of considering whether a claim amended by the introduction of an undisclosed disclaimer is allowable under Article 123(2) EPC, the disclaimer must fulfil one of the criteria set out in point 2.1 of the order of decision G 1/03.

The introduction of such a disclaimer may not provide a technical contribution to the subject-matter disclosed in the application as filed. In particular, it may not be or become relevant for the assessment of inventive step or for the question of sufficiency of disclosure. The disclaimer may not remove more than necessary either to restore novelty or to disclaim subject-matter excluded from patentability for non-technical reasons.


[ 1 ] Ces sommaires/exergues ne sont publiés à l'Annexe 3 que dans la langue de la procédure.

Quick Navigation