T 0150/82 (Claim Categories) vom 07.02.1984
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:1984:T015082.19840207
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 7. Februar 1984
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0150/82
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 79101037.4
- IPC-Klasse
- -
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- -
- Name des Antragstellers
- IFF
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.3.01
- Leitsatz
I. Claims relying on references to the description in the specification in respect of all their technical features (known in the patent practice of the United Kingdom as "omnibus" claims) are unallowable as contrary to Rules 29(4) and 29(6) EPC, unless absolutely necessary, e.g. when a plurality of conditions would not lend themselves to verbal expression without such a reference. The onus is on the applicant to show such exceptionality.
II. Claims for products defined in terms of processes for their preparation (known as "product-by-process" claims) are admissible only if the products themselves fulfil the requirements for patentability and there is no other information available in the application which could enable the applicant to define the product satisfactorily by reference to its composition, structure or some other testable parameter.
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 52(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 64(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973European Patent Convention R 29(4) 1973European Patent Convention R 29(6) 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Claim categories
Product-by-process claims
Omnibus claims - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- G 0002/12G 0002/13T 0148/87T 0434/87T 0271/88T 0601/88T 0411/89T 0563/89T 0130/90T 0407/90T 0493/90T 0664/90T 0792/90T 0339/91T 0478/91T 0656/91T 0957/91T 0073/92T 0555/92T 0881/92T 0882/92T 0124/93T 0141/93T 0333/93T 0412/93T 0659/93T 0815/93T 0020/94T 0752/94T 0749/95T 0223/96T 0532/96T 0644/97T 0948/97T 0950/97T 1048/97T 1074/97T 0068/98T 0238/98T 0726/98T 0728/98T 0748/98T 0375/99T 1029/99T 0360/00T 0363/00T 0872/01T 0933/01T 0288/02T 0179/03T 1044/03T 1200/03T 0447/04T 0582/04T 0956/04T 1430/04T 0046/06T 0912/06T 1087/06T 1316/06T 1962/07T 1960/08T 0360/09T 2019/09T 0967/10T 2186/11T 0150/12T 0834/12T 0863/12T 1988/12T 2533/12T 1304/13T 0081/14T 2268/17T 1370/19T 1384/19T 1884/19T 1867/22T 1065/23
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision of the Examining Division dated 20 March 1982 is set aside.
2. The request for the reimbursement of appeal fee is rejected.
3. The appeal, insofar as it relates to claim Sets I and II submitted with the letter dated 13 October 1983, is rejected.
4. The application is remitted to the first instance for further substantive examination on the basis of claims 1 to 8 in Set III, relating to processes.