European Patent Office

T 0769/92 (General-purpose management system) vom 31.05.1994

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:1994:T076992.19940531
Datum der Entscheidung
31. Mai 1994
Aktenzeichen
T 0769/92
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
86110223.4
IPC-Klasse
G06F 15/21
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
Amtsblattfassungen
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
-
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
General-purpose management system, method for operating said system and transfer slip
Name des Antragstellers
Sohei
Name des Einsprechenden
-
Kammer
3.5.01
Leitsatz

I. An invention comprising functional features implemented by software (computer programs) is not excluded from patentability under Article 52(2)(c), (3) EPC, if technical considerations concerning particulars of the solution of the problem the invention solves are required in order to carry out that same invention.

Such technical considerations lend a technical nature to the invention in that they imply a technical problem to be solved by (implicit) technical features.

An invention of this kind does not pertain to a computer program as such under Article 52(3).

II. Non-exclusion from patentability cannot be destroyed by an additional feature which as such would itself be excluded, as in the present case features referring to management systems and methods which may fall under the "methods for doing business" excluded from patentability under Article 52(2)(c), (3) EPC (following established case law according to which a mix of features, some of which are excluded under Article 52(2) and (3) EPC and some of which are not so excluded, may be patentable (in contrast to recent case law concerning inventions excluded by Article 52(4) EPC, cf. T 820/92 according to which one feature excluded under Article 52(4) EPC suffices for the whole claim to be excluded from patentability)).

Schlagwörter
Non-exclusion from patentability - technical considerations to be regarded as resulting in a technical contribution to the art - no doing business as such - no computer programs as such - no presentation of information as such
Remittal for further prosecution
Orientierungssatz
-
Zitierte Akten
T 0026/86T 0038/86

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the first instance for further prosecution on the basis of the application documents according to the Appellant's main request (cf. point V), having regard to the above final remarks (points 4.1 to 4.4).