European Patent Office

T 1149/97 (Fluid transducer/SOLARTRON) vom 07.05.1999

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:1999:T114997.19990507
Datum der Entscheidung
7. Mai 1999
Aktenzeichen
T 1149/97
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
88301957.2
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
Amtsblattfassungen
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
-
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
Fluid transducer
Name des Antragstellers
Solartron Group Limited
Name des Einsprechenden
Endress + Hauser GmbH + Co.
Kammer
3.4.02
Leitsatz

1. Without opposition, issue of a decision to grant a European patent normally constitutes a "cut-off" point for making amendments to the application documents in the European proceedings. If an opposition has been filed, "cut-off" effects due to the grant of a patent may be seen in the restrictions imposed on further amendments to the patent specification by Rules 57a and 87 and Article 123(3) EPC.

2. Although Article 123(3) EPC only addresses the claims of the European patent, amendments to the description and the drawings may also extend the protection conferred in accordance with Article 69(1) EPC.

3. If, in view of Articles 84 and 69 EPC, the application documents have been adapted to amended claims before grant, thereby deleting part of the subject-matter originally disclosed in order to avoid inconsistencies in the patent specification, as a rule subject-matter deleted for this reason can neither be reinserted into the patent specification nor into the claims as granted without infringing Article 123(3) EPC. An analogous finding applies to subject-matter retained in the patent specification during such adaptation for reasons of comprehensibility, but indicated as not relating to the claimed invention (see point 6. of the reasons).

Schlagwörter
Novelty - main request and auxiliary requests 2 & 3 (no)
Orientierungssatz
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to maintain the patent with the following claims, and description and drawings to be adapted:

Claims 1 to 8 according to the sixth auxiliary request submitted during the oral proceedings.