T 0860/93 (Protective coating compositions) du 29.12.1993
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T086093.19931229
- Date de la décision
- 29 décembre 1993
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0860/93
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 88115147.6
- Classe de la CIB
- C08B 11/193
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Carboxymethyl hydrophobically modified hydroxyethylcellulose (cmhmhec) and use of cmhmhec in protective coating compositions
- Nom du demandeur
- Aqualon Company
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.03
- Sommaire
1. Where a quality is expressed in a claim as being within a given numerical range, the method for measuring that quality must either be general technical knowledge, so that no explicit description is needed, or a method of measuring that quality needs to be identified (decision T 124/85 of 14 December 1987 - not reported in OJ EPO - followed). In contrast, where a claim specifies a relative quality, in this case that the products should be "water-soluble", it is not normally necessary to identify any method for its determination.
2. The provision of Article 69(1) EPC, according to which the description and drawings shall be used to interpret the claims, applies also to the clarity requirement of Article 84 EPC, provided that the claims are not self-contradictory (decision T 454/89 of 11 March 1991 - not published in OJ EPO - explained).
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 69 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973
- Mots-clés
- Claims - clarity
- Exergue
- -
- Affaires citantes
- T 0324/92T 0434/92T 0785/92T 0723/93T 0884/93T 0682/94T 0337/95T 0338/95T 0860/95T 0671/96T 0287/97T 0497/97T 0751/97T 1129/97T 0908/98T 0939/98T 0592/99T 0208/00T 0250/00T 0193/01T 0545/01T 0378/02T 0467/02T 0556/02T 0056/04T 0905/05T 0931/06T 1088/07T 0375/08T 0620/08T 1545/08T 1817/14T 0997/15T 1105/16T 2939/19T 3097/19T 3181/19T 0056/21T 1208/21T 0865/22
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division for further examination.