R 0003/10 (Right to be heard in oral proceedings/SALMON BRANDS AS) vom 29.09.2011
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2011:R000310.20110929
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 29. September 2011
- Aktenzeichen
- R 0003/10
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- T 0136/09 2010-01-14
- Anmeldenummer
- 01931465.7
- IPC-Klasse
- A22C 25/16
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Improved method for the manufacture of raw fish products
- Name des Antragstellers
- Salmon Brands AS
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Trio Fish Processing Machinery
Pan Fish
Fjord Seafood
Marine Harvest International
Asociación de la Industria del Salmon de Chile AG - Kammer
- -
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 100(a)European Patent Convention Art 100(b)European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)European Patent Convention Art 113(1)European Patent Convention Art 116(1)European Patent Convention Art 116(2)European Patent Convention R 103(1)(a)European Patent Convention R 106European Patent Convention R 108(3)European Patent Convention R 109(2)(a)European Patent Convention R 109(2)(b)European Patent Convention R 110European Patent Convention R 67 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Petition for review - admissible - yes
Objection raised after decision was given - Rule 106 complied with - yes - could not be raised earlier
Petition for review - allowable - yes - fundamental violation of petitioner's right to be heard in oral proceedings - yes - rejection of request on a ground not heard on
Presence of fundamental violation - to be determined on an objective basis - not relevant that no fault of the Board
Likelihood of success of potential oral submissions - whether submissions were already presented in writing - not relevant
Reimbursement of fee for petition - yes - Orientierungssatz
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under review is set aside and proceedings before the Board of Appeal are re-opened.
2. The fee for the petition for review shall be reimbursed.