T 0989/23 vom 04.04.2025
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2025:T098923.20250404
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 4. April 2025
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0989/23
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 07024737.4
- IPC-Klasse
- C09D 123/06C09D 123/08C08L 23/06
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- Zusammenfassung von Article 12(4) RPBA
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- COATED PIPES HAVING IMPROVED MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES AND A METHOD OF PRODUCTION THEREOF
- Name des Antragstellers
- Borealis Technology Oy
- Name des Einsprechenden
- The Dow Chemical Company
- Kammer
- 3.3.02
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention Art 84Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(6)
- Schlagwörter
- Inventive step - partial technical problems
Claims - clarity after amendment
Amendment to case - exercise of discretion
Fundamental procedural defect - Orientierungssatz
- A board has the power to review an opposition division's procedural decision to consider late submissions filed in opposition proceedings. Otherwise, the parties' right to a judicial review of an essential part of the opposition division's decision would be denied. Moreover, on appeal, a board would be compelled to accept a legal and factual framework even if it is based on an erroneous exercise of discretion (point 9.7 of the Reasons).
- Zitierte Akten
- G 0007/93G 0003/14R 0006/19R 0011/20T 0326/87T 0182/88T 0430/89T 0669/90T 0640/91T 0951/91T 0201/92T 0986/93T 0755/96T 0502/98T 1209/05T 1549/07T 0582/08T 0620/08T 0980/08T 1178/08T 1652/08T 1074/10T 1852/11T 2197/11T 1568/12T 0026/13T 0572/14T 0341/15T 0487/16T 0617/16T 0776/17T 0966/17T 1768/17T 2603/18T 0256/19T 2685/19T 3201/19T 0326/22
- Zitierende Akten
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The patent is revoked.