T 0292/85 (Polypeptide expression) vom 27.01.1988
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:1988:T029285.19880127
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 27. Januar 1988
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0292/85
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 78300596.0
- IPC-Klasse
- C12K 1/02
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- -
- Name des Antragstellers
- Genentech
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.3.02
- Leitsatz
1. An invention (here: biological) is sufficiently disclosed if at least one way is clearly indicated enabling the person skilled in the art to carry out the invention. Then the non-availability of some particular variants or unsuitability of some unspecified variants of a functionally defined component feature of the invention is immaterial to sufficiency as long as there are suitable variants known to the skilled person through the disclosure or common general knowledge which provide the same effect for the invention. The disclosure need not include specific instructions as to how all possible component variants within the functional definition should be obtained (cf. point 3.1.5 of the Reasons).
2. Generally applicable biological processes are not insufficiently described for the sole reason that some starting materials or genetic precursors therefor, e.g. a particular DNA or plasmid, are not readily available to obtain each and every variant of the expected result of the invention (here: product) provided the process as such is reproducible (cf. point 3.3.3 of the Reasons).
3. The non-obviousness of the plasmids also imparts an inventive step to the other claimed subject-matters relating to their preparation and to their use for making polypeptides and immunogenic substances.
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 123 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention Art 83 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973European Patent Convention R 27(1)(f) 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Sufficiency of disclosure
Functional terms in claims
Provision of all embodiments
Inclusion of future inventions
Non-availability or unsuitability of some components
Non-availability of starting materials for general processes
Inventive step
Closest art pointing away from invention
Trial doomed to failure
Common general knowledge
Publications qualifying in early history of a particular art
Non-obviousness of plasmids
Other claimed subject-matter involving plasmids - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- G 0001/98G 0001/03G 0002/03T 0283/86T 0299/86T 0347/87T 0495/89T 0673/89T 0537/90T 0610/90T 0740/90T 0097/91T 0391/91T 0435/91T 0456/91T 0676/91T 0242/92T 0585/92T 0612/92T 0694/92T 0720/92T 0923/92T 0296/93T 0311/93T 0588/93T 0356/94T 0386/94T 0464/94T 0656/94T 0758/94T 0794/94T 0856/94T 0639/95T 0691/95T 0013/96T 0050/96T 0085/96T 0263/96T 0449/96T 0188/97T 0322/97T 0339/97T 0354/97T 0998/97T 1212/97T 0016/98T 0524/98T 1052/98T 0193/99T 1065/99T 0499/00T 0817/00T 0984/00T 1173/00T 0397/02T 0411/02T 0558/03T 0601/05T 0710/05T 0799/05T 0510/06T 0995/06T 0519/07T 0824/07T 0155/08T 1740/08T 1001/13T 2374/13T 1475/15T 2172/15T 0081/16T 0752/17T 1424/18T 0986/21T 0518/22T 1113/22T 1977/22T 2037/22T 0036/23T 0083/23
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The patent is granted on the basis of description and the Claims 1 to 16, as submitted during the oral proceedings with the drawings as originally filed.