European Patent Office

T 0647/93 (Procedural violation) vom 06.04.1994

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:1994:T064793.19940406
Datum der Entscheidung
6. April 1994
Aktenzeichen
T 0647/93
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
88309812.1
IPC-Klasse
G11B 5/64
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
Amtsblattfassungen
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
-
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
Magneto-optic recording medium and method of magneto-optic recording using the same medium
Name des Antragstellers
Hitachi Maxell
Name des Einsprechenden
-
Kammer
3.5.02
Leitsatz

I. The provision of Article 113(2) EPC, that the European Patent Office shall consider and decide upon the European patent application or the European patent only in the text submitted to it, or agreed, by the applicant for or proprietor of the patent, is a fundamental procedural principle, being part of the right to be heard, and is of such prime importance that any infringement of it, even as the result of a mistaken interpretation of a request, must, in principle, be considered to be a substantial procedural violation. In any case, such violation occurs when, as in the present case, the Examining Division does not make use of the possibility of granting interlocutory revision under Article 109 EPC, after the mistake has been pointed out in the grounds of appeal.

Schlagwörter
Decision of first instance not taken on text submitted by applicant - substantial procedural violation
Failure to follow procedure set out in Guidelines - not a substantial procedural violation
Decision of first instance not well reasoned - not a substantial procedural violation
Remittal to first instance for further prosecution
Reimbursement of appeal fee
Orientierungssatz
-
Zitierte Akten
-

ORDER

For these reasons, it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division for further prosecution.

3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is allowed.