T 0615/95 (Acridinium esters/CIBA CORNING) du 16.12.1997
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1997:T061595.19971216
- Date de la décision
- 16 décembre 1997
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0615/95
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 89309705.5
- Classe de la CIB
- C07D 219/04
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Nucleophilic polysubstituted aryl acridinium esters, conjugates, production and uses thereof
- Nom du demandeur
- Ciba Corning Diagnostics Corp.
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.01
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
- Mots-clés
- Amendment of a generic chemical formula
Admissible limitation - Exergue
- 1. If there are three independent lists of sizeable length specifying distinct meanings for three residues in a generic chemical formula in a claim, then the deletion in each list of one originally disclosed meaning is allowable under Article 123(2) EPC if it does not result in singling out any hitherto not specifically mentioned individual compound or group of compounds, but maintains the remaining subject-matter as a generic group of compounds differing from the original group only by its smaller size. Such shrinking of the generic group of chemical compounds is not objectionable if these deletions do not lead to a particular combination of specific meanings of the respective residues which was not disclosed originally or, in other words, do not generate another invention (see no. 6 of the Reasons for the Decision).
2. An Examining Division's decision should not be supplemented normally by annexes dealing with issues having no relation to the issues dealt with in the reasons for this decision (see no. 14 of the Reasons for the Decision). - Affaires citantes
- G 0002/10T 0859/94T 0488/96T 0531/96T 0050/97T 0994/97T 0942/98T 0309/99T 0924/00T 0345/01T 1066/01T 1185/01T 0259/02T 0678/02T 0801/02T 0948/02T 0336/03T 0339/03T 0696/04T 0005/05T 0894/05T 0001/06T 0910/06T 1054/06T 1107/06T 1197/06T 1733/06T 0490/07T 0714/08T 0888/08T 0371/10T 1075/12T 1419/12T 0137/15T 1150/15T 1621/16T 1808/16T 1894/16T 1602/17T 2004/20T 0775/21T 0795/21
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division for further prosecution.