T 0019/87 (Oral proceedings) vom 16.04.1987
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:1987:T001987.19870416
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 16. April 1987
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0019/87
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 82304491.2
- IPC-Klasse
- G03F 7/26
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Method for forming patterned resist layer on semiconductor
- Name des Antragstellers
- Fujitsu
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.4.01
- Leitsatz
1. If, on the true meaning of a communication from a party, it constitutes a request for oral proceedings, there is no power to issue an adverse decision without first appointing such oral proceedings.
2. A finding in a decision that there had not been a request for oral proceedings, although wrong, did not constitute either
a) grounds or evidence on which the decision to refuse was based, so there is no violation of Article 113(1) EPC or
b) a substantial procedural violation for the purpose of Rule 67 EPC.
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 113 1973European Patent Convention Art 116 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Request for interview as preliminary to oral proceedings
Decision to refuse issued without oral proceedings
Decision void ab initio and set aside
Application remitted to Examining Division for oral proceedings
No substantial procedural violation - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- J 0012/15T 0209/88T 0560/88T 0668/89T 0680/89T 0494/90T 0663/90T 0766/90T 0872/90T 0621/91T 0543/92T 0793/92T 1049/92T 0235/93T 0401/93T 0863/93T 0917/93T 0163/94T 0215/94T 0808/94T 0556/95T 0671/95T 0909/95T 0285/02T 0815/02T 0911/04T 0419/05T 1434/06T 1606/07T 1791/07T 1494/08T 2245/08T 0162/09T 2299/10T 1072/11T 2373/11T 2457/13T 1951/16T 1800/23
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The Decision of the Examining Division dated 4 August 1986 is set aside.
2. The application is remitted to the Examining Division with the order that oral proceedings under Article 116 EPC shall take place before the Examining Division decides whether to grant or refuse European patent application No. 82 304 491.2 inder Article 97 EPC.
3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is rejected.