European Patent Office

T 0585/08 (Re-establishment of rights in respect of the time limit for filing the notice of appeal (no)) du 20.10.2009

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T058508.20091020
Date de la décision
20 octobre 2009
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0585/08
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
03700147.6
Classe de la CIB
H04N 13/00
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Apparatus for stereoscopic photography
Nom du demandeur
Perisic, Zoran
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.5.04
Sommaire
-
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
Decision AC of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under Article 7 of the EPC Revision Act Art 001Decision AC of 7 December 2006 amending the Implementing Regulations to the EPC 2000 Art 002EPC Revision Act of 29 November 2000European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 109European Patent Convention Art 110European Patent Convention Art 111 1973European Patent Convention Art 119 1973European Patent Convention Art 120European Patent Convention Art 122European Patent Convention R 131(4)European Patent Convention R 136(1)European Patent Convention R 136(2)European Patent Convention R 78(2) 1973
Mots-clés
Date of removal of cause of non-compliance determined (yes)
Reasoned request for re-establishment of rights in due time (no)
Duty of the EPO to warn appellant about deficiency (no)
Power of the board to examine appeal on its merits (no)
Exergue
The principle of good faith does not impose any obligation on the EPO to scrutinize documents on file to establish whether grounds and facts with respect to a request for re-establishment of rights are missing (points 13-19 of the Reasons).

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The request for re-establishment of rights is rejected.

2. The appeal is not deemed to have been filed.

3. The appeal fee is reimbursed.