T 0585/08 (Re-establishment of rights in respect of the time limit for filing the notice of appeal (no)) du 20.10.2009
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T058508.20091020
- Date de la décision
- 20 octobre 2009
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0585/08
- En ligne le
- 6 avril 2010
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 03700147.6
- Classe de la CIB
- H04N 13/00
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Apparatus for stereoscopic photography
- Nom du demandeur
- Perisic, Zoran
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.5.04
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 109European Patent Convention Art 110European Patent Convention Art 120European Patent Convention Art 122European Patent Convention R 131(4)European Patent Convention R 136(1)European Patent Convention R 136(2)EPC Revision Act of 29 November 2000Decision AC of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under Article 7 of the EPC Revision Act Art 001Decision AC of 7 December 2006 amending the Implementing Regulations to the EPC 2000 Art 002European Patent Convention Art 111 1973European Patent Convention Art 119 1973European Patent Convention R 78(2) 1973
- Mots-clés
- Date of removal of cause of non-compliance determined (yes)
Reasoned request for re-establishment of rights in due time (no)
Duty of the EPO to warn appellant about deficiency (no)
Power of the board to examine appeal on its merits (no) - Exergue
- The principle of good faith does not impose any obligation on the EPO to scrutinize documents on file to establish whether grounds and facts with respect to a request for re-establishment of rights are missing (points 13-19 of the Reasons).
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request for re-establishment of rights is rejected.
2. The appeal is not deemed to have been filed.
3. The appeal fee is reimbursed.