T 1732/10 du 19.12.2013
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T173210.20131219
- Date de la décision
- 19 décembre 2013
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1732/10
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 03738853.5
- Classe de la CIB
- B05B 15/08B05B 12/04B05B 1/32
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- DEVICE FOR THE APPLICATION OF A FLUID
- Nom du demandeur
- Eftec Europe Holding AG
- Nom de l'opposant
- ABB PATENT GmbH
Dürr Systems GmbH - Chambre
- 3.2.07
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(1)(b)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(6)
- Mots-clés
- Late-filed main and auxiliary requests 1 to 10 - not admitted
Reinstating a withdrawn request as late as at the oral proceedings-late amendment of the case, not admitted - Exergue
- Not reacting in substance to the appeal of the opponent, but waiting for the Board's preliminary opinion before any substantive reaction is filed, is regarded as an abuse of procedure. It is contrary to the equal distribution of rights and obligations upon both sides in inter-partes proceedings and to the principle that both sides should set out their complete case at the outset of the proceedings. Both principles are clearly established by the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal.
This is all the more so if the substantiation for all the requests, which were filed after summons to oral proceedings have been sent, is filed only shortly before the oral proceedings before the Board. Such requests which are not self-explanatory - are considered by the Board as submitted only on the date of their substantiation. Such very late requests are contrary to procedural economy, do not take account of the state of the proceedings and cannot be reasonably dealt with by the Board without adjournment of the proceedings or remittal to the department of first instance, contrary to Article 13(1) and 13(3) RPBA.
Where such very late requests take up subject-matter only available from the description, it cannot automatically be assumed that it was covered by the initial search, nor that it is automatically the responsibility of the opponent to perform such a search (see points 1.1 to 1.8). - Affaires citantes
- T 0447/09T 1890/09T 0217/10T 0013/11T 0664/11T 1134/11T 1273/11T 1836/12T 1914/12T 2288/12T 0122/13T 0964/13T 0568/14T 1090/14T 1695/14T 1784/14T 2101/14T 0369/15T 2068/15T 1753/16T 1990/16T 0206/17T 0558/17T 1426/17T 1447/17T 1519/17T 0319/18T 0750/18T 1776/18T 2117/18T 2393/18T 2964/18T 0031/19T 0073/19T 0238/19T 0957/20T 0321/21T 1128/21T 1220/21
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The patent is revoked.