T 1776/18 du 05.10.2022
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T177618.20221005
- Date de la décision
- 5 octobre 2022
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1776/18
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 12769275.4
- Classe de la CIB
- A23J 3/16A23L 33/185A23J 3/14A23L 33/00A23L 2/66
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- Résumé de EPC2000 Art 114(2)
- Titre de la demande
- POWDERED NUTRITIONAL FORMULATIONS INCLUDING SPRAY-DRIED PLANT PROTEIN
- Nom du demandeur
- ABBOTT LABORATORIES
- Nom de l'opposant
- Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH
Cosucra-Groupe Warcoing SA
N.V. Nutricia
Spreepatent Schutzrechtsverwertung und
Innovationstransfer GmbH
Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. - Chambre
- 3.3.09
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Art 6(1)European Patent Convention Art 113(2)European Patent Convention Art 114(1)European Patent Convention Art 114(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(1)European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention R 116(1)European Patent Convention R 116(2)European Patent Convention R 79(1)European Patent Convention R 81(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
- Mots-clés
- Inventive step - (no)
Late-filed request - request identical to request not admitted in first instance proceedings
Legal basis for not admitting late-filed requests
Amendment after summons - taken into account (no) - Exergue
- 1.) Article 114(2) EPC provides a legal basis for disregarding claim requests which are not submitted in due time (Reasons 4.5.1-4.5.11).
2.) A claim request which is filed in opposition proceedings after the date set under Rule 116(1) EPC is not submitted in due time within the meaning of Article 114(2) EPC (Reasons 4.6.1-4.6.10).
3.) Rule 116(2) EPC does not limit the Opposition Division's discretionary power under Article 114(2) EPC and Rule 116(1) EPC. As a rule, this discretionary power does not depend on the contents of the Opposition Division's communication under Rule 116(1) EPC. However, if the Opposition Division invites the patent proprietor to file an amended claim request to address a specific objection and the patent proprietor complies with this invitation by filing the required amendments by the date set under Rule 116(1) EPC, the Opposition Division's discretion not to admit that claim request may effectively be reduced to zero (Reasons 4.7.1-4.7.8). - Affaires citées
- G 0002/88G 0010/91G 0004/92G 0007/93G 0003/14R 0006/19J 0014/19T 0912/91T 0133/92T 0202/92T 0771/92T 0502/98T 0706/00T 0171/03T 0235/08T 0811/08T 1734/08T 1100/10T 1732/10T 1914/12T 1933/12T 2288/12T 2385/12T 2536/12T 0487/13T 1855/13T 0066/14T 0108/14T 1784/14T 0525/15T 1758/15T 0688/16T 0754/16T 0044/17T 0966/17T 1042/18T 1078/18T 1270/18T 1558/18T 0085/19T 0256/19
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The patent is revoked.