European Patent Office

T 1776/18 du 05.10.2022

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T177618.20221005
Date de la décision
5 octobre 2022
Numéro de l'affaire
T 1776/18
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
12769275.4
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Non distribuées (D)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
Résumé de EPC2000 Art 114(2)
Titre de la demande
POWDERED NUTRITIONAL FORMULATIONS INCLUDING SPRAY-DRIED PLANT PROTEIN
Nom du demandeur
ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Nom de l'opposant
Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH
Cosucra-Groupe Warcoing SA
N.V. Nutricia
Spreepatent Schutzrechtsverwertung und
Innovationstransfer GmbH
Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.
Chambre
3.3.09
Sommaire
-
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Art 6(1)European Patent Convention Art 113(2)European Patent Convention Art 114(1)European Patent Convention Art 114(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(1)European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention R 116(1)European Patent Convention R 116(2)European Patent Convention R 79(1)European Patent Convention R 81(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Mots-clés
Inventive step - (no)
Late-filed request - request identical to request not admitted in first instance proceedings
Legal basis for not admitting late-filed requests
Amendment after summons - taken into account (no)
Exergue
1.) Article 114(2) EPC provides a legal basis for disregarding claim requests which are not submitted in due time (Reasons 4.5.1-4.5.11).
2.) A claim request which is filed in opposition proceedings after the date set under Rule 116(1) EPC is not submitted in due time within the meaning of Article 114(2) EPC (Reasons 4.6.1-4.6.10).
3.) Rule 116(2) EPC does not limit the Opposition Division's discretionary power under Article 114(2) EPC and Rule 116(1) EPC. As a rule, this discretionary power does not depend on the contents of the Opposition Division's communication under Rule 116(1) EPC. However, if the Opposition Division invites the patent proprietor to file an amended claim request to address a specific objection and the patent proprietor complies with this invitation by filing the required amendments by the date set under Rule 116(1) EPC, the Opposition Division's discretion not to admit that claim request may effectively be reduced to zero (Reasons 4.7.1-4.7.8).

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.