J 0007/82 (Cause of non-compliance) vom 23.07.1982
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:1982:J000782.19820723
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 23. Juli 1982
- Aktenzeichen
- J 0007/82
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 79901231.5
- IPC-Klasse
- -
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- -
- Name des Antragstellers
- Cataldo
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.1.01
- Leitsatz
I. The provisions of Rule 78(2) EPC, last sentence, which deem postal notifications to have been made when despatch has taken place, do not apply in a case in which the receipt of a notification under Rule 69(1) EPC is relevant to the question when the cause of non-compliance with a time limit has been removed, for the purposes of Article 122 EPC. In such a case the significant date is the date of actual receipt by the applicant.
II. If a decision does not take into account arguments submitted by a party and is based on a ground on which the party had no opportunity to present his comments, this is a substantial procedural violation.
III. Reimbursement of the appeal fee may be ordered pursuant to Rule 67 EPC, even though reimbursement has not been applied for, if the conditions laid down in that rule are fulfilled.
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 113(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 114(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 122 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973European Patent Convention R 78(2) 1973Patent Cooperation Treaty Art 22(1)
- Schlagwörter
- Non-compliance/cause of
Reestablishment of rights
No opportunity to present comments
Procedural violation (substantial)
Appeal fee/reimbursement
Reimbursement of appeal fee - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- R 0002/14R 0004/14R 0027/24J 0011/83J 0032/86J 0017/89J 0028/92J 0013/93J 0029/94J 0010/99J 0027/01J 0010/03J 0011/03J 0017/05J 0013/07J 0006/08J 0011/09J 0012/09J 0013/09J 0014/09J 0012/10J 0001/13J 0004/13J 0016/17T 0900/90T 0228/93T 0381/93T 0949/94T 0955/94T 0181/95T 0754/95T 0135/96T 0394/96T 0027/98T 0428/98T 0778/98T 1059/98T 0626/99T 0914/00T 1039/00T 0038/01T 0833/01T 0097/02T 0024/04T 0170/04T 0172/04T 0763/04T 1136/04T 0246/08T 0585/08T 0841/08T 1536/08T 0135/10T 0820/10T 2120/10T 2316/10T 0387/11T 0233/12T 0876/12T 0578/13T 1929/13T 2352/13T 0736/14T 0629/15T 1423/15T 2091/15T 2086/16T 1414/18T 1968/18T 0989/19T 2864/19T 0529/20T 1051/20T 1215/20T 0625/21T 1550/21T 0289/23T 1987/23
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision of the Receiving Section of the European Patent Office dated 29 December 1981 that an application for re-establishment of rights in European patent application No. 79901231.5 was inadmissible is set aside and the case is remitted to the Receiving Section to be considered on its merits.
2. Reimbursement of the appeal fee is ordered.