T 0689/90 (Event detector) du 21.01.1992
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T068990.19920121
- Date de la décision
- 21 janvier 1992
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0689/90
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 85302557.5
- Classe de la CIB
- G01R 31/08
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- -
- Nom du demandeur
- Raychem Corporation
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.4.01
- Sommaire
1. Features which are not disclosed in the description of the invention as originally filed but which are only described in a cross-referenced document which is identified in such description are prima facie not within "the content of the application as filed" for the purpose of Article 123(2) EPC. It is only under particular conditions that such features can be introduced by way of amendment into the claims of an application.
2. Such an amendment would not contravene Article 123(2) if the description of the invention as filed leaves no doubt to a skilled reader:
(a) that protection is or may be sought for such features;
(b) that such features contribute to achieving the technical aim of the invention and are thus comprised in the solution of the technical problem underlying the invention which is the subject of the application;
(c) that such features implicitly clearly belong to the description of the invention contained in the application as filed (Article 78(1)(b) EPC), and thus to the content of the application as filed (Article 123(2) EPC);
(d) that such features are precisely defined and identifiable within the total technical information within the reference document.
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 78(1)(b) 1973
- Mots-clés
- Amendments based on cross-referenced document identified in description
- Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- -
- Affaires citantes
- J 0016/13T 0196/92T 0952/93T 0287/94T 0144/96T 0374/96T 0927/96T 0497/97T 0546/97T 1187/97T 0762/98T 0945/98T 0569/99T 0292/01T 0750/02T 0558/03T 0960/03T 0236/04T 0150/05T 1497/06T 0417/07T 1415/07T 0191/08T 1378/08T 1427/10T 0664/11T 0857/11T 1436/12T 1451/12T 2477/12T 2498/12T 1321/13T 0926/16T 1125/17T 1084/22
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The request to refer a point of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is refused.
2. The appeal is dismissed.