T 1007/01 (Intervention/EOS) vom 27.10.2004
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2004:T100701.20041027
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 27. Oktober 2004
- Aktenzeichen
- T 1007/01
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 96103986.4
- IPC-Klasse
- B29C 67/00
- Verfahrenssprache
- Deutsch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Deutsch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- T 1007/01 2005-09-30
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objektes
- Name des Antragstellers
- EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems
- Name des Einsprechenden
- 3D Systems Inc.
- Kammer
- 3.2.05
- Leitsatz
Under Article 112(1)(a) EPC the following points of law are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:
I. After withdrawal of the sole appeal, may the proceedings be continued with a third party who intervened during the appeal proceedings?
II. If the answer to question I is yes:
Is entitlement to continue the proceedings conditional on the intervener's compliance with formal requirements extending beyond the criteria for an admissible intervention explicitly laid down in Article 105 EPC; in particular, does the appeal fee have to be paid?
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 105 1973European Patent Convention Art 107 1973European Patent Convention Art 108 1973European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Intervention in appeal proceedings
Continuation of proceedings after withdrawal of sole appeal
Referral to Enlarged Board of Appeal - Orientierungssatz
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
Under Article 112(1)(a) EPC the following points of law are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:
I. After withdrawal of the sole appeal, may the proceedings be continued with a third party who intervened during the appeal proceedings?
II. If the answer to question I is yes:
Is entitlement to continue the proceedings conditional on the intervener's compliance with formal requirements extending beyond the criteria for an admissible intervention explicitly laid down in Article 105 EPC; in particular, does the appeal fee have to be paid?