T 0585/08 (Re-establishment of rights in respect of the time limit for filing the notice of appeal (no)) vom 20.10.2009
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T058508.20091020
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 20. Oktober 2009
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0585/08
- Online am
- 6. April 2010
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 03700147.6
- IPC-Klasse
- H04N 13/00
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Apparatus for stereoscopic photography
- Name des Antragstellers
- Perisic, Zoran
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.5.04
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 109European Patent Convention Art 110European Patent Convention Art 120European Patent Convention Art 122European Patent Convention R 131(4)European Patent Convention R 136(1)European Patent Convention R 136(2)EPC Revision Act of 29 November 2000Decision AC of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under Article 7 of the EPC Revision Act Art 001Decision AC of 7 December 2006 amending the Implementing Regulations to the EPC 2000 Art 002European Patent Convention Art 111 1973European Patent Convention Art 119 1973European Patent Convention R 78(2) 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Date of removal of cause of non-compliance determined (yes)
Reasoned request for re-establishment of rights in due time (no)
Duty of the EPO to warn appellant about deficiency (no)
Power of the board to examine appeal on its merits (no) - Orientierungssatz
- The principle of good faith does not impose any obligation on the EPO to scrutinize documents on file to establish whether grounds and facts with respect to a request for re-establishment of rights are missing (points 13-19 of the Reasons).
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request for re-establishment of rights is rejected.
2. The appeal is not deemed to have been filed.
3. The appeal fee is reimbursed.