T 0989/15 vom 05.03.2020
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T098915.20200305
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 5. März 2020
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0989/15
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 08836787.5
- IPC-Klasse
- B23K 26/08B41F 31/26B41F 31/02B41N 7/06
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- A method for printing a substrate using an anilox roll, an anilox roll for a printing method and a printing apparatus
- Name des Antragstellers
- Apex Europe B.V.
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Kurt Zecher GmbH
Applied Laser Engineering Ltd - Kammer
- 3.2.05
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 104(1) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 123(2) (2007)European Patent Convention R 103(1)(a) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(3) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(1) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 16 (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 25 (2020)
- Schlagwörter
- Late-filed requests filed after arrangement of oral proceedings
Late-filed request - admitted (main request, first to third auxiliary requests: no; fourth auxiliary request: yes)
Amendments - allowable (no)
Reimbursement of appeal fee - (no)
Apportionment of costs - (no) - Orientierungssatz
- At the third level of the convergent approach applicable in appeal proceedings in accordance with the revised version of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA 2020), the boards of appeal are free to use or not use the criteria set out in Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 when deciding, in the exercise of their discretion in accordance with Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, whether to admit an amendment made at this stage of the proceedings. This also holds true when Article 13 RPBA 2007, rather than Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, is to be applied. (See section 16 of the Reasons)
- Zitierende Akten
- R 0018/24R 0022/24T 0709/16T 0752/16T 0764/16T 1107/16T 1291/16T 1304/16T 1614/16T 1786/16T 1797/16T 2615/16T 0590/17T 0596/17T 1440/17T 1695/17T 2272/17T 2273/17T 2461/17T 2787/17T 0129/18T 0568/18T 0995/18T 1199/18T 1433/18T 0085/19T 1134/19T 1183/19T 1590/19T 1659/19T 1698/19T 2401/19T 2795/19T 0920/20T 1581/20T 0324/21T 0953/21T 2225/22
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee and the request for apportionment of costs are refused.