T 0611/90 (Fresh Case) vom 21.02.1991
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:1991:T061190.19910221
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 21. Februar 1991
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0611/90
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 83306484.3
- IPC-Klasse
- C08F 210/16
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- -
- Name des Antragstellers
- Mitsui
- Name des Einsprechenden
- DSM Research
- Kammer
- 3.3.03
- Leitsatz
1. Under Article 106(1) EPC, appeals lie from decisions rather than from the grounds of such decisions. Apart from other deficiencies, an appeal raising a case entirely different from that on which the decision under appeal was based is still admissible if it is based on the same opposition ground (point 2 of the Reasons).
2. If there is such an entirely different case, it may, subject to the other circumstances of the case, be inappropriate for an Appeal Board to deal itself with its allowability. The public's and the parties' interest in having the proceedings speedily concluded may then be overridden by the requirement that appeal proceedings should not become a mere continuation of first- instance proceedings (point 3 of the Reasons).
3. In the absence of strong mitigating circumstances for the late filing of such a fresh case, the late-filing party should bear all the additional costs incurred by his tardiness (point 5 of the Reasons).
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 104 1973European Patent Convention Art 106(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 108 1973European Patent Convention Art 114 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Admissibility of appeal (affirmed)
Reasons unconnected with those of appealed decision, but still within same opposition ground
Remittal to first instance (affirmed)
Entirely new case not yet examined before
Apportionment of costs
Absence of reasons for his tardiness given by the opponent - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- G 0002/24T 0229/90T 0443/90T 0832/90T 0852/90T 0025/91T 0039/91T 0318/91T 0374/91T 0506/91T 0938/91T 0951/91T 0003/92T 0229/92T 0684/92T 0152/93T 0847/93T 0970/93T 1016/93T 0191/94T 0201/94T 0257/94T 0676/94T 0147/95T 0252/95T 0389/95T 0585/95T 0708/95T 1007/95T 0062/96T 0191/96T 0855/96T 1044/97T 0368/98T 0869/98T 0527/99T 0875/99T 0932/99T 0955/99T 0962/99T 0333/01T 0402/01T 0717/01T 0064/02T 0454/02T 0853/02T 0237/03T 0156/04T 0963/04T 1029/05T 1557/05T 1146/06T 1265/07T 1685/07T 0369/08T 0349/09T 0584/09T 1676/09T 1363/10T 2549/12T 0509/13T 2262/14T 2069/15T 2233/15T 0972/16T 0238/19
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is admissible.
2. The Opposition Division's decision is set aside.
3. The case is remitted to the Opposition Division for further prosecution.
4. The costs in the future proceedings before the Opposition Division, and in any subsequent appeal, shall be apportioned so that the opponent shall pay to the patentee the whole of the costs which will be legitimately incurred by the patentee in dealing with the case as remitted as above.