European Patent Office

T 0358/08 du 09.07.2009

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T035808.20090709
Date de la décision
9 juilliet 2009
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0358/08
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
99946652.7
Classe de la CIB
A61F 13/15
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Fastener device and disposable product using the same
Nom du demandeur
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Nom de l'opposant
SCA Hygiene Products AB
3M Innovative Properties Company
Chambre
3.2.06
Sommaire
-
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention R 64 1973European Patent Convention R 99(1)European Patent Convention R 99(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Mots-clés
Admissibility - yes
Inventive step - no
Exergue
(1) Rule 99 EPC 2000 has not altered the previous law as to the requirements of either the notice of appeal or the statement of grounds of appeal as regards the appellant's requests. Rule 99(1)(c) EPC is satisfied if the notice of appeal contains a request, which may be implicit, to set aside the decision in whole or (where appropriate) only as to part. Such a request has the effect of "defining the subject of the appeal" within the meaning of Rule 99(1)(c) EPC.
(2) In the case of an appeal by an applicant or proprietor, it is not necessary that the notice of appeal should also contain a request for maintenance of the patent in any particular form. This is something which relates to "the extent to which [the decision] is to be amended", and which is therefore a matter for the statement of grounds of appeal under Rule 99(2) EPC.

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.