T 0358/08 du 09.07.2009
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T035808.20090709
- Date de la décision
- 9 juilliet 2009
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0358/08
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 99946652.7
- Classe de la CIB
- A61F 13/15
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Fastener device and disposable product using the same
- Nom du demandeur
- THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
- Nom de l'opposant
- SCA Hygiene Products AB
3M Innovative Properties Company - Chambre
- 3.2.06
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention R 64 1973European Patent Convention R 99(1)European Patent Convention R 99(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
- Mots-clés
- Admissibility - yes
Inventive step - no - Exergue
- (1) Rule 99 EPC 2000 has not altered the previous law as to the requirements of either the notice of appeal or the statement of grounds of appeal as regards the appellant's requests. Rule 99(1)(c) EPC is satisfied if the notice of appeal contains a request, which may be implicit, to set aside the decision in whole or (where appropriate) only as to part. Such a request has the effect of "defining the subject of the appeal" within the meaning of Rule 99(1)(c) EPC.
(2) In the case of an appeal by an applicant or proprietor, it is not necessary that the notice of appeal should also contain a request for maintenance of the patent in any particular form. This is something which relates to "the extent to which [the decision] is to be amended", and which is therefore a matter for the statement of grounds of appeal under Rule 99(2) EPC. - Affaires citées
- G 0009/92G 0004/93G 0001/99J 0022/86J 0027/86J 0003/06T 0007/81T 0089/85T 0001/88T 0085/88T 0194/90T 0631/91T 0632/91T 0727/91T 0925/91T 0273/92T 0932/93T 0372/94T 0281/95T 0049/99T 0179/01T 0407/02T 0420/03T 0474/03
- Affaires citantes
- T 0844/05T 0509/07T 0437/08T 0137/09T 0226/09T 0624/09T 0689/09T 0004/10T 0028/10T 0457/10T 0648/10T 0789/10T 0249/11T 0377/11T 1162/11T 2561/11T 0154/12T 0183/12T 0256/13T 0413/13T 0620/13T 1695/13T 1777/14T 0424/15T 0551/15T 0653/15T 0958/16T 2272/16T 2411/16T 0414/17T 0889/17T 2212/18T 2293/18T 2200/19
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.