T 2357/12 (Universal succession) du 28.11.2013
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T235712.20131128
- Date de la décision
- 28 novembre 2013
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 2357/12
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 01202177.0
- Classe de la CIB
- C22B 7/04C04B 26/26C04B 18/14C04B 28/02
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Process for processing stainless steel slags
- Nom du demandeur
- Trading and Recycling Company Sint Truiden
- Nom de l'opposant
- Harsco Minerals Canada Corporation
- Chambre
- 3.3.05
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 112(1)European Patent Convention Art 117(1)European Patent Convention R 142(1)(a)European Patent Convention R 152(9)European Patent Convention R 22(3)European Patent Convention R 84(2)
- Mots-clés
- Admissibility of opposition - transfer of opponent status (yes) - prerequisites and effects of universal succession
Evidence - evaluation of evidence - probative force of private documents in inter partes proceedings
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (no) - Exergue
- 1."Universal succession" as an exception to Rule 22(3) EPC is a concept of procedural law under the European Patent Convention and is to be construed autonomously by the EPO, independent from national law [cf. reasons 7, 10 to 12].
2. Under the case law of the Boards of Appeal, the main considerations for acknowledging that a universal succession has taken place are legal certainty as to the person of the successor and the need to avoid a legal vacuum [reasons 8, 9].
3. Under that case law, the transfer of all assets of an enterprise, immediately followed by its dissolution as a legal entity, may constitute a universal succession [reasons 13 to 15]. - Affaires citées
- G 0004/88G 0003/97G 0002/04J 0005/81T 0349/86T 0475/88T 0659/92T 0870/92T 0353/95T 0670/95T 0019/97T 0298/97T 1137/97T 0656/98T 0711/99T 0074/00T 0015/01T 0136/01T 0413/02T 1091/02T 0085/03T 0229/03T 0261/03T 0956/03T 0006/05T 0724/05T 1421/05T 1206/06T 1514/06T 1697/07T 0384/08T 0960/08T 1877/08T 0022/09T 1032/10T 1957/10T 0184/11
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.