T 0288/92 (Herbicides/SCHERING) du 18.11.1993
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T028892.19931118
- Date de la décision
- 18 novembre 1993
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0288/92
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 87302915.1
- Classe de la CIB
- C07D 249/12
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Triazolopyrimidine herbicides
- Nom du demandeur
- Schering Agrochemicals Limited
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.01
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973
- Mots-clés
- Implicit disclosure (no)
Novelty test (not appropriate for deciding the allowability of amendments)
Procedural violations (no) - Exergue
- I. The allowability of amendments under Article 123(2) EPC is to be decided solely on the basis of examining whether the amendments are directly and unambiguously derivable (extractable) from the application as filed. Any questions raised by a "novelty test" are hypothetical and therefore irrelevant (point 3.2 of the reasons).
II. It is not permissible to amend a generic formula defining a class of chemical compounds by restricting an originally disclosed generic definition of a substituent to a specific (individual) one which is arbitrarily selected from chemical entities, such as worked examples,without some support for such restriction in the general part of the description. (point 3.4 of the reasons). - Affaires citantes
- T 0783/91T 0680/93T 0955/93T 0303/94T 0476/94T 0922/94T 1063/96T 0010/97T 0188/97T 0232/97T 0364/97T 0895/97T 1052/97T 0278/98T 0450/98T 0728/98T 1118/98T 0427/99T 0451/99T 0725/99T 0991/99T 0040/00T 0196/00T 0406/00T 0468/00T 0106/01T 0345/01T 0334/02T 0902/02T 0176/04T 0868/04T 0877/04T 1234/04T 0145/05T 0728/05T 0947/05T 1152/05T 1239/05T 1410/05T 0281/06T 0674/06T 1015/06T 0792/07T 0592/08T 0714/08T 1485/08T 0236/09T 2285/09T 0025/10T 0626/11T 0860/12T 1587/13T 2117/13T 1537/14
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is consequently refused.