European Patent Office

T 0843/91 (Partiality) vom 17.03.1993

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T084391.19930317
Datum der Entscheidung
17. März 1993
Aktenzeichen
T 0843/91
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
82306197.3
IPC-Klasse
G03C 7/32
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
Download
-
Amtsblattfassungen
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
Photographic elements containing aryloxy substituted photographic material
Name des Antragstellers
Kodak
Name des Einsprechenden
Fuji
Kammer
3.3.01
Leitsatz

1. The wording of Article 24 EPC and procedural considerations imply that an objection to the members of a Board of Appeal can only be made in the course of an appeal pending before that Board of Appeal.

2. Article 24(3) EPC states that "members" of a Board of Appeal may be objected to by any party. This implies that objection may be made against each or all the members of that Board.

3. The Boards of Appeal are the final instance and their decisions become final once they have been delivered, with the effect that the appeal proceedings are terminated.

4. In proceedings, partiality would be to willingly favour the party by granting it rights to which it is not entitled or by intentionally disregarding the rights of another party.

5. After the decision has been taken a Board is no longer empowered or competent to take any further action apart from drafting the written decision (apart also Rule 88 EPC). Any further action which in the light of the decision becomes necessary, is the responsibility of the internal administration.

Schlagwörter
All members of a Board of Appeal objected to
New members nominated under Article 24 EPC
Admissibility of the objection (yes)
Suspected partiality (no)
Intervention of an expert common practice of the Boards of Appeal
End of the appeal proceedings
Documents submitted subsequent to the decision
Loss of instance (no)
Rights of a party disregarded (no)
Award of costs (no)
Orientierungssatz
-
Zitierte Akten
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The main and auxiliary requests under Article 24 EPC are rejected.

2. The requests of both parties for an award of costs are rejected.