T 0014/83 (Vinylchlorid resins) vom 07.06.1983
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:1983:T001483.19830607
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 7. Juni 1983
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0014/83
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 79300604.0
- IPC-Klasse
- -
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- -
- Name des Antragstellers
- Sumitomo
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.3.01
- Leitsatz
1. The question whether an invention has been disclosed sufficiently clearly and completely is not to be decided solely on the basis of the content of the claims. If a chemical invention involves the task of manufacturing a product with certain measurable properties (e.g. gel content or degree of polymerisation of a copolymer), and this task is performed by means of a process involving several variables, then the means of its performance are to be regarded as sufficiently disclosed within the meaning of Article 83 EPC if, encountering occasional lack of success notwithstanding strict adherence to the prescribed limits of those variables, clear information, contained in the description, regarding the effects of individual variables on the properties of the product enables the person skilled in the art to bring about the desired properties quickly and reliably in such an event.
2. If teaching thus disclosed cannot be defined in a claim precisely enough to rule out occasional failure, such a claim is not to be objected to, provided it is possible to deduce from the description the action to be taken - which also cannot be precisely defined - by way of fine tuning of the variables.
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 83 1973European Patent Convention R 29 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Content of the claims
Disclosure of invention
Lack of succes - occasional - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- T 0079/88T 0155/88T 0312/88T 0453/88T 0475/88T 0291/89T 0435/89T 0623/89T 0082/90T 0410/90T 0791/90T 0376/91T 0393/91T 0418/91T 0444/91T 0656/91T 0886/91T 0931/91T 0951/91T 0117/92T 0503/92T 0573/92T 0585/92T 0068/93T 0583/93T 0024/94T 0140/94T 0356/94T 0799/95T 0518/96T 1067/96T 0354/97T 0470/97T 0488/97T 1055/98T 1149/98T 1163/98T 0620/99T 0363/00T 1082/01T 0327/02T 1146/02T 0260/03T 0936/03T 0108/04T 0169/04T 0895/04T 1253/04T 0510/05T 1576/05T 0364/06T 1743/06T 0431/07T 1614/07T 1133/08T 0119/12T 1034/12T 2374/13T 1064/15T 0377/17T 0594/20T 2015/20T 0603/22
ORDER
For these reasons, It is decided that:
1. The decision of the Examining Division of the European Patent Office dated 18 August 1982 is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the first instance for substantive examination on the basis of the 7 claims dated 11 March 1983, received on 11 April 1983.