G 0001/16 (Disclaimer III) vom 18.12.2017
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2017:G000116.20171218
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 18. Dezember 2017
- Aktenzeichen
- G 0001/16
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- T 0437/14 2016-10-17
- Anmeldenummer
- 08003327.7
- IPC-Klasse
- H05B 33/14C09K 11/06H01L 51/30
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Complexes of form L2IrX
- Name des Antragstellers
- The Trustees of Princeton University
The University of Southern California - Name des Einsprechenden
- Merck Patent GmbH
BASF SE - Kammer
- -
- Leitsatz
For the purpose of considering whether a claim amended by the introduction of an undisclosed disclaimer is allowable under Article 123(2) EPC, the disclaimer must fulfil one of the criteria set out in point 2.1 of the order of decision G 1/03.
The introduction of such a disclaimer may not provide a technical contribution to the subject-matter disclosed in the application as filed. In particular, it may not be or become relevant for the assessment of inventive step or for the question of sufficiency of disclosure. The disclaimer may not remove more than necessary either to restore novelty or to disclaim subject-matter excluded from patentability for non-technical reasons.
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- Bundesgericht: 4a 541 / 2013Bundesgerichtshof X ZR 75/08, X ZR 54/09, X ZR 161/12, X ZR 5/16, Xa ZB 14/09Bundespatentgericht: O2012 030Court of Appeal of England and Wales: LG Philips LCD Co Ltd v Tatung (UK) Ltd & Ors [2006] EWCA Civ 1774, Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v Ratiopharm GmbH [2009] EWCA Civ 252, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd v Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH [2013] EWCA Civ 919Decision of national courts citedEuropean Patent Convention Art 100(a)European Patent Convention Art 100(b)European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 112(1)European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)European Patent Convention Art 123(1)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 52European Patent Convention Art 52(4) 1973European Patent Convention Art 53European Patent Convention Art 53(c)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 54(2)European Patent Convention Art 54(3)European Patent Convention Art 54(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 54(4)European Patent Convention Art 54(4) 1973European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention Art 57European Patent Convention Art 69(1)European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention Art 87European Patent Convention R 115(2)FranceGermanyPatents Court: Abbott Laboratories Ltd v Evysio Medical Devices ULC [2008] EWHC 800 (Pat), Ratiopharm GmbH v Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd [2008] EWHC 3070 (Pat), Nicocigs Ltd v Fontem Holdings 1 BV [2016] EWHC 2161 (Pat)Rechtbank Den Haag: IEPT20050715, ECLI:NL:RBSGR:2006:BA1058, IEPT20060808, BIE 2010 nr. 37, IER 2020 nr. 59, IEPT20120220, IEPT20130605Rechtbank Utrecht: IER 2013/9Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 10Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 13Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 14(2)Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 14(4)Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 9SwitzerlandThe NetherlandsTribunal de Grande Instance de Paris: 09/56031, 09/12706, 10/05718, 14/15459United Kingdom
- Schlagwörter
- Allowability of undisclosed disclaimers
Applicability of the gold standard disclosure test as defined in decision G 2/10 to undisclosed disclaimers no
Applicability of criteria as defined in decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 yes
Drafting of undisclosed disclaimers no technical contribution to the claimed subject-matter of the application as filed may be provided - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- G 0003/89G 0011/91G 0001/93G 0002/98G 0001/03G 0002/03G 0001/07G 0002/10G 0001/15T 0004/80T 0080/85T 0313/86T 0433/86T 0155/87T 0170/87T 0296/87T 0003/89T 0012/90T 0124/90T 0172/90T 0857/91T 0434/92T 0436/92T 0597/92T 0653/92T 0710/92T 0448/93T 1050/93T 0098/94T 0426/94T 0673/94T 0917/94T 0982/94T 0645/95T 0915/95T 0596/96T 0608/96T 0863/96T 0871/96T 0893/96T 0013/97T 0308/97T 0323/97T 1071/97T 1125/97T 0318/98T 0339/98T 0351/98T 0043/99T 0201/99T 0451/99T 0507/99T 0525/99T 1049/99T 1050/99T 1086/99T 0285/00T 0500/00T 0664/00T 0747/00T 1102/00T 0010/01T 0014/01T 0134/01T 0584/01T 1146/01T 0067/02T 0161/02T 0506/02T 0217/03T 0285/03T 0788/05T 1559/05T 0286/06T 1107/06T 0008/07T 1068/07T 1695/07T 0761/08T 0923/08T 1049/08T 1870/08T 2018/08T 0477/09T 0678/09T 0748/09T 1045/09T 1176/09T 1487/09T 1843/09T 2102/09T 0447/10T 1836/10T 2464/10T 0074/11T 2130/11T 0336/12T 0632/12T 1297/12T 0850/13T 1441/13T 1808/13T 2502/13T 0075/14T 0287/14T 1224/14T 1872/14
- Zitierende Akten
- R 0004/23R 0012/23T 0767/12T 1656/13T 2030/13T 0437/14T 0660/14T 1218/14T 1662/14T 2000/14T 0944/15T 1354/15T 1525/15T 0600/16T 0712/16T 2635/16T 2643/16T 0437/17T 0951/17T 1438/17T 2381/17T 0210/18T 0311/18T 1174/18T 1272/18T 1919/18T 2242/18T 2275/18T 2277/18T 2510/18T 0247/19T 0855/19T 1283/19T 1403/19T 1473/19T 1916/19T 2116/19T 2411/19T 3077/19T 0051/20T 0110/20T 0179/20T 0279/20T 0768/20T 1052/20T 1137/20T 1688/20T 2028/20T 0088/21T 0126/21T 1047/21T 1297/21T 2047/21T 2252/21T 0267/22T 0273/22T 0518/22T 0557/22T 0903/22T 1054/22T 1416/22T 0203/23T 0211/23T 0227/23T 0441/23T 0749/23T 0863/23T 1543/23T 1552/23T 1584/23T 1733/23T 1945/23T 0180/24T 0714/24
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The questions referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal are answered as follows:
For the purpose of considering whether a claim amended by the introduction of an undisclosed disclaimer is allowable under Article 123(2) EPC, the disclaimer must fulfil one of the criteria set out in point 2.1 of the order of decision G 1/03.
The introduction of such a disclaimer may not provide a technical contribution to the subject-matter disclosed in the application as filed. In particular, it may not be or become relevant for the assessment of inventive step or for the question of sufficiency of disclosure. The disclaimer may not remove more than necessary either to restore novelty or to disclaim subject-matter excluded from patentability for non-technical reasons.