G 0001/05 (Exclusion and objection/XXX) vom 07.12.2006
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2006:G000105.20061207
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 7. Dezember 2006
- Aktenzeichen
- G 0001/05
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- T 0039/03 2005-08-26
- Anmeldenummer
- 99100131.4
- IPC-Klasse
- H01L 31/18
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- G 0001/05 Demande divisionnaire/ASTROPOWER 2007-06-28G 0001/05 Divisional/ASTROPOWER 2007-06-28G 0001/05 Divisional/ASTROPOWER 2007-06-28G 0001/05 Teilanmeldung/ASTROPOWER 2007-06-28
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Improved columnar-grained polycrystalline solar cell and process of manufacture
- Name des Antragstellers
- ASTROPOWER Inc.
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- -
- Leitsatz
I. If a member of a Board of Appeal in a notice of withdrawal gives a ground which may by its nature constitute a possible ground for an objection of partiality that ground should normally be respected by the decision on replacement of the Board member concerned (Reasons, point 7).
II. As regards proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal and unless there are specific circumstances throwing doubt on the Board member's ability to approach the parties' submissions with an open mind on a later occasion there cannot be any objectively justified, i.e. reasonable suspicion of partiality against a member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal within the meaning of Article 24(3), first sentence, EPC for the reason that a position on the matter was adopted in a prior decision of a Board of Appeal in which the Board member concerned had participated (Reasons, point 27).
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- BDS Art 2(3)Codice di procedura civile (IT) Art 51Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Art 6(1)ECHR R_028(2)(a)ECHR R_028(2)(d)ECHR R_028(3)ECHR: Piersack v. Belgium (1982) of 1 October 1982, Series A, 5 E.H.C.R.169European Patent Convention Art 105(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 24(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 24(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 24(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 24(4) 1973European Patent Convention Art 76(1) 1973European Patent Convention R 66(2)(g) 1973Federal Constitution (AT) Art 87(3)Federal Constitution (CH) Art 30(1)Federal Constitution (DE) Art 101(i) 2Jurisdiktionsnorm (AT) §20Patentgesetz (AT) §76Puolitaival and Pirttiaho v. Finland of 23 November 2004, No. 54857RPBA_Art_013_Sent_3Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 1(2)UK: Locabail (UK) v. Bayfield Properties Ltd, [2000] QB 451, Jones v. DAS Legal Expenses Insurance Co Ltd [2004] I.R.L.R. 218, CAZivilprozessordnung (DE) §41
- Schlagwörter
- Notice of withdrawal under Article 24(2) EPC - requirements for replacement of a member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal - Suspicion of partiality against a member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal - merely based on participation of that member in a prior decision of a Board of Appeal having taken a position on the matter - suspicion not justified on an objective basis
- Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- G 0002/08G 0003/08G 0004/08G 0001/09G 0002/10G 0004/19R 0012/09R 0015/11R 0002/12R 0019/12R 0008/13R 0002/14R 0002/15J 0020/05J 0005/07J 0002/08J 0001/09J 0007/13J 0019/13J 0013/14T 0039/03T 0307/03T 0556/03T 1115/03T 0936/04T 1040/04T 1160/04T 0047/05T 0265/05T 0687/05T 1387/05T 1409/05T 1018/06T 1020/06T 1491/06T 1497/06T 0868/07T 0993/07T 1033/07T 1391/07T 1423/07T 1465/07T 1501/07T 1502/07T 0051/08T 0463/08T 0464/08T 0465/08T 0600/08T 0941/08T 1799/08T 2082/08T 2321/08T 0144/09T 0549/09T 0925/09T 0961/09T 0962/09T 1627/09T 2175/09T 2329/09T 0196/10T 0471/10T 0803/10T 2402/10T 2461/10T 0649/11T 0683/11T 1155/11T 1483/11T 1736/11T 1760/11T 2563/11T 0879/12T 1780/12T 1808/12T 2450/12T 0557/13T 1765/13T 1766/13T 1852/13T 1889/13T 1931/13T 2041/13T 2089/13T 0013/14T 0015/14T 0318/14T 0470/14T 1257/14T 1856/14T 0049/15T 1146/15T 1824/15T 2175/15T 2290/15T 1864/16T 2440/16T 2707/16T 0568/17T 1243/17T 1656/17T 1966/17T 2078/17T 2475/17T 0363/18T 0450/18T 0844/18T 1098/18T 1255/18T 2327/18T 0339/19T 1134/19T 1219/19T 1312/19T 1566/19T 1770/19T 2476/19T 2805/19T 3035/19T 3167/19T 0051/20T 0466/20T 1493/20T 2252/21T 0563/22T 0582/22T 1332/22T 1446/22T 1870/22T 2274/22T 2594/22T 0911/23T 1128/23T 1876/23
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. Ms X is replaced by Mr Alting van Geusau.
2. The objection under Article 24(3) EPC against Mr Y is rejected.