T 0409/91 (Fuel oils) du 18.03.1993
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T040991.19930318
- Date de la décision
- 18 mars 1993
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0409/91
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 87308436.2
- Classe de la CIB
- C10L 1/24
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- -
- Nom du demandeur
- Exxon
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.01
- Sommaire
The questions of sufficiency and of support by the description are questions of fact which have to be answered on the basis of the available evidence having regard to the balance of probabilities in each individual case. Although the requirements of sufficient disclosure of the invention (Art. 83 EPC) and support by the description (Art. 84 EPC) are related to different parts of the patent application, they give effect to the same legal principle that the patent monopoly should be justified by the technical contribution to the art. Therefore, the extent to which an invention is sufficiently disclosed is also highly relevant for the answer to the question of support (points 3.3 to 3.5 of the Reasons).
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 83 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973European Patent Convention R 29(1) 1973European Patent Convention R 29(3) 1973
- Mots-clés
- Support by the description (no), clarity no
Sufficiency of disclosure (no) - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- -
- Affaires citantes
- T 0435/91T 0548/91T 0128/92T 0143/92T 0585/92T 0612/92T 0634/92T 0639/92T 0694/92T 0923/92T 0939/92T 0012/93T 0169/93T 0206/93T 0322/93T 0329/93T 0556/93T 0583/93T 0659/93T 1078/93T 0207/94T 0656/94T 0716/94T 0903/94T 0919/94T 0002/95T 0099/95T 0311/95T 0495/95T 0616/95T 0691/95T 0727/95T 0994/95T 0289/96T 0488/96T 0534/96T 0842/96T 0146/97T 0322/97T 0354/97T 0400/97T 0445/97T 0586/97T 0636/97T 0743/97T 1055/97T 1129/97T 1138/97T 1213/97T 0051/98T 0160/98T 0217/98T 0517/98T 0591/98T 0687/98T 0713/98T 0720/98T 0924/98T 0981/98T 1122/98T 0364/99T 0620/99T 1083/99T 0190/00T 0792/00T 0877/00T 1076/00T 1173/00T 1188/00T 0118/01T 0137/01T 0142/01T 0219/01T 0356/01T 0387/01T 0524/01T 0573/01T 0619/01T 0632/01T 0716/01T 0782/01T 1082/01T 1204/01T 0078/02T 0378/02T 0437/02T 0440/02T 0609/02T 1008/02T 1067/02T 1124/02T 0126/03T 0319/03T 0487/03T 1008/03T 1121/03T 1155/03T 1241/03T 0166/04T 0337/04T 0354/04T 0895/04T 0094/05T 0339/05T 0369/05T 0673/05T 1044/05T 1217/05T 1466/05T 0089/06T 0123/06T 0142/06T 0186/06T 0359/06T 0381/06T 0622/06T 0942/06T 1063/06T 1072/06T 1111/06T 1140/06T 1141/06T 1205/06T 1362/06T 1395/06T 1599/06T 1604/06T 1743/06T 0003/07T 0061/07T 0066/07T 0188/07T 0234/07T 0272/07T 0512/07T 0519/07T 0522/07T 0609/07T 0617/07T 0813/07T 0891/07T 0386/08T 0406/08T 0663/08T 1468/08T 1486/08T 1941/08T 0115/09T 0176/09T 0189/09T 1966/09T 2277/09T 2323/09T 0347/10T 0430/10T 0553/10T 0812/10T 1591/10T 1636/10T 1693/10T 1948/10T 0110/11T 0307/11T 0348/11T 0862/11T 0958/11T 1502/11T 1558/11T 1626/11T 1947/11T 2528/11T 0123/12T 0443/12T 0544/12T 0608/12T 0758/12T 0809/12T 0889/12T 1136/12T 1545/12T 1694/12T 1727/12T 1875/12T 2090/12T 2194/12T 2301/12T 2344/12T 0094/13T 0494/13T 0498/13T 1678/13T 2128/13T 2229/13T 2374/13T 0004/14T 0088/14T 0264/14T 0314/14T 1111/14T 1845/14T 2197/14T 0078/15T 0136/15T 0186/15T 0387/15T 0673/15T 0703/15T 0861/15T 1034/15T 1334/15T 1439/15T 1475/15T 1959/15T 2225/15T 0030/16T 0434/16T 0875/16T 1698/16T 1821/16T 2242/16T 0298/17T 0518/17T 1436/17T 1285/18T 1804/18T 2091/18T 2353/18T 2424/18T 2613/18T 0084/19T 2401/19T 2698/19T 2702/19T 0250/20T 2015/20T 0056/21T 0149/21T 0867/21T 0900/21T 0953/21T 0956/21T 1225/21T 0925/22T 1311/22T 1339/22T 1445/22T 1977/22T 2279/22T 0164/23T 0591/23T 0824/23T 1272/23T 0602/24
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.