T 0197/86 (Photographic couplers) du 04.02.1988
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1988:T019786.19880204
- Date de la décision
- 4 février 1988
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0197/86
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 80303642.5
- Classe de la CIB
- G03C 7/34
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- -
- Nom du demandeur
- Kodak
- Nom de l'opposant
- Agfa Gevaert
- Chambre
- 3.3.02
- Sommaire
In the case where comparative tests are chosen to demonstrate an inventive step with an improved effect over a claimed area, the nature of the comparison with the closest state of the art must be such that the effect is convincingly shown to have its origin in the distinguishing feature of the invention. For this purpose it may be necessary to modify the elements of comparison so that they differ only by such a distinguishing feature (supplementing T 181/82, "Spiro compounds", OJ EPO 1984, 401) (cf. point 6.1.3 of the Reasons).
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
- Mots-clés
- Inventive step (yes)
Comparative tests, prerequisites therefor - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- -
- Affaires citantes
- T 0386/87T 0226/88T 0298/90T 0292/92T 0423/92T 0412/94T 0561/94T 0664/95T 0710/95T 0084/96T 0185/96T 0819/96T 0955/96T 0465/97T 0642/97T 0763/97T 1078/97T 1179/97T 0277/98T 0773/98T 0400/99T 0494/99T 0199/00T 0583/00T 0873/00T 0948/01T 0986/01T 0339/02T 0369/02T 0421/02T 0442/02T 0480/02T 0496/02T 0512/02T 0784/02T 0234/03T 0268/03T 0446/03T 0984/03T 1034/03T 1213/03T 0059/04T 0357/04T 1220/04T 0028/05T 0099/05T 0488/05T 0540/05T 0603/05T 0808/05T 0938/05T 1204/05T 1550/05T 0107/06T 0233/06T 0276/06T 0912/06T 1114/06T 1204/06T 1218/06T 1277/06T 1374/06T 1851/06T 0040/07T 0172/07T 0574/07T 0647/07T 0716/07T 1050/07T 1114/07T 1118/07T 1252/07T 1705/07T 1835/07T 0295/08T 0470/08T 0530/08T 0595/08T 0615/08T 1044/08T 1250/08T 1397/08T 1652/08T 1756/08T 1872/08T 2299/08T 0175/09T 0314/09T 0812/09T 0908/09T 1035/09T 1380/09T 2034/09T 2043/09T 0245/10T 0783/10T 0832/10T 0875/10T 1012/10T 1590/10T 1600/10T 1689/10T 2418/10T 0057/11T 0568/11T 1168/11T 1263/11T 2112/11T 2244/11T 2321/11T 2475/11T 0183/12T 1009/12T 1181/12T 1390/12T 1962/12T 0195/13T 0383/13T 1457/13T 2179/13T 2194/13T 2311/13T 0153/14T 0215/14T 1872/14T 2123/14T 2319/14T 0756/15T 0822/15T 0406/16T 0710/16T 0155/17T 0990/17T 1259/17T 2200/17T 1368/18T 2406/18T 2921/18T 0576/19T 1660/19T 0296/20T 0394/20T 0742/20T 1445/21T 1466/21T 1813/21T 2133/21T 0414/22T 0903/22T 1313/22T 1359/22T 0315/23T 0787/23T 1733/23T 1868/23T 0018/24
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.