T 0153/85 (Alternative claims) du 11.12.1986
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T015385.19861211
- Date de la décision
- 11 décembre 1986
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0153/85
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 81107193.5
- Classe de la CIB
- C08G 75/23
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Use of aromatic amorphous thermoplastic polymers for the production of moulded articles
- Nom du demandeur
- AMOCO Corporation
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.01
- Sommaire
1. If an appellant desires that the allowability of alternative sets of claims should be considered in an appeal, such alternative claims should normally be filed with the statement of grounds of appeal or as soon as possible thereafter.
2. When deciding an appeal during oral proceedings, a Board of Appeal may refuse to consider alternative claims which have been filed at a late stage, e.g. during the oral proceedings, if such claims are not clearly allowable.
3. When assessing novelty, the disclosure of a prior document must be considered in isolation. It is only the actual content of a document (as understood by a skilled man) which destroys novelty.
4. A prior document may on its proper construction (i.e. when its meaning to the skilled man ist determined) incorporate part or all of a second prior document into its disclosure, by specific reference to the second document.
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 108 1973European Patent Convention Art 110 1973European Patent Convention Art 111 1973European Patent Convention Art 54 1973
- Mots-clés
- Alternative claims newly submitted at oral hearing as main request
Abuse of procedure
Main request rejected because filed late and not clearly allowable
Novelty
Construction of single prior document in light of reference document
Confirmation of principle of consideration of a citation in isolation - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- -
- Affaires citantes
- T 0047/86T 0053/87T 0322/87T 0051/88T 0055/88T 0483/88T 0516/88T 0630/88T 0038/89T 0160/89T 0331/89T 0334/89T 0543/89T 0632/89T 0770/89T 0051/90T 0251/90T 0614/90T 0626/90T 0693/90T 0755/90T 0025/91T 0033/91T 0048/91T 0369/91T 0452/91T 0506/91T 0942/91T 0951/91T 0955/91T 0146/92T 0148/92T 0234/92T 0304/92T 0422/92T 0631/92T 0772/92T 0831/92T 0026/93T 0092/93T 0206/93T 0371/93T 0655/93T 0708/93T 0825/93T 0866/93T 1045/93T 0442/94T 0541/94T 0575/94T 0617/94T 0680/94T 0681/94T 0794/94T 0888/94T 0900/94T 0007/95T 0177/95T 0231/95T 0267/95T 0312/95T 0399/95T 0446/95T 0463/95T 0468/95T 0483/95T 0490/95T 0516/95T 0568/95T 0610/95T 0660/95T 0845/95T 0937/95T 0995/95T 0036/96T 0074/96T 0098/96T 0191/96T 0210/96T 0295/96T 0463/96T 0489/96T 0570/96T 0645/96T 1032/96T 0202/97T 0685/97T 0815/97T 1015/97T 1071/97T 1126/97T 1153/97T 1185/97T 0047/98T 0279/98T 0345/98T 0438/98T 0456/98T 0543/98T 0670/98T 0725/98T 0791/98T 0840/98T 0929/98T 0937/98T 1105/98T 1114/98T 1153/98T 0024/99T 0118/99T 0265/99T 0482/99T 0634/99T 0690/99T 0813/99T 0842/99T 0068/00T 0139/00T 0408/00T 0771/00T 1020/00T 1042/00T 0002/01T 0035/01T 0589/01T 0051/02T 0077/02T 0121/02T 0504/02T 0611/02T 0684/02T 1213/02T 0006/03T 0025/03T 0227/03T 0235/03T 0455/03T 0491/03T 0610/03T 0651/03T 0668/03T 0780/03T 0818/03T 0869/03T 0278/04T 0448/04T 0500/04T 0555/04T 0769/04T 0792/04T 1018/04T 0081/05T 0087/05T 0101/05T 0148/05T 0173/05T 0214/05T 0221/05T 0382/05T 0424/05T 0487/05T 0596/05T 0708/05T 0736/05T 1385/05T 1443/05T 0008/06T 0020/06T 0074/06T 0180/06T 0236/06T 0563/06T 0641/06T 1351/06T 1536/06T 0066/07T 0411/07T 0519/07T 0574/07T 0824/07T 0875/07T 1397/07T 1685/07T 1715/07T 0334/08T 0337/08T 0592/08T 0615/08T 1239/08T 2290/08T 0070/09T 0176/09T 0305/09T 0867/09T 0868/09T 2043/09T 2112/09T 0220/10T 0456/10T 1014/10T 2420/10T 0078/11T 0214/11T 0966/11T 1572/11T 1576/11T 2644/11T 0138/12T 0438/12T 0493/12T 1674/12T 0664/13T 1376/13T 0038/15T 2570/16T 2671/19T 0506/20
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision of the Examining Division is set aside.
2. The main request is rejected.
3. The case is remitted to the Examining Division for further substantive examination on the basis of Claims 1 to 3 of the auxiliary request submitted during the Oral Proceedings.