Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t061031eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 1031/06 (Probiotic lactic acid bacteria/NESTLÉ) 09-04-2009
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 1031/06 (Probiotic lactic acid bacteria/NESTLÉ) 09-04-2009

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T103106.20090409
Date of decision
09 April 2009
Case number
T 1031/06
Petition for review of
-
Application number
01986261.4
IPC class
A61K 35/74
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 89.21 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Use of probiotic lactic acid bacteria for balancing the skin's immune system

Applicant name
Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.04
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 54 1973
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
Keywords
Main request: - added matter (no) - clarity (yes) - novelty (yes) - inventive step (yes)
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0005/83
T 0939/92
T 0435/04
Citing decisions
T 1075/09
T 0334/10

I. European patent application No. 01 986 261.4 was published as international application WO-A-02/28402 with the title "Use of probiotic lactic acid bacteria for balancing the skin's immune system".

II. At the oral proceedings held on 7 June 2005 before the examining division, the applicant wished to proceed with claims 1-10 of the main request filed on 6 May 2005 and the claims of the 1st to 6th auxiliary requests filed with fax on 6 June 2005 (see the "Minutes", paragraph 2). The examining division accepted the claims of the 5th auxiliary request (renamed "3rd auxiliary request" during the oral proceedings). Claim 1 of this request read as follows:

"1. Use of a probiotic lactic acid bacterium selected from CNCM I-1225 or CNCM I-2116, or a culture supernatant thereof for preparing a carrier for preventing ultraviolet radiation induced immuno-suppression in the skin."

III. With letter dated 27 January 2006 the applicant expressed its disagreement to the text as proposed for grant and requested the grant of a patent on the basis of the main request filed on 28 October 2005 (which was identical to the 2nd auxiliary request filed with the fax of 6 June 2005).

IV. However, since claim 1 of this 2nd auxiliary request had been found during the previous oral proceedings held on 7 June 2005 not to be acceptable for lack of compliance with the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC, the examining division refused the application under Article 97(1) EPC.

V. The applicant (appellant) filed an appeal against the decision of the examining division.

VI. The board sent a communication pursuant to Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) indicating its preliminary non-binding opinion.

VII. Submissions in reply to the board's communication were filed on 3 November 2008 with a main request and an auxiliary request. In this letter, the appellant also clarified that his request for oral proceedings did not apply if the board, on the basis of the written submissions on file, were to come to a positive decision. Subsequently, the board did not consider oral proceedings to be necessary.

VIII. Further to a phone interview, a new main request was submitted by facsimile on 26 March 2009 in replacement of any previous claim requests. Claim 1 of the main request read as follows:

"1. Use of probiotic lactic acid bacteria or a culture supernatant thereof for preparing an ingestable carrier for down-regulating inflammatory or allergic reaction in the skin induced by UV irradiation of the skin and up-regulating the immune system in the skin during an immuno-suppressive condition induced by UV irradiation of the skin."

Dependent claims 2 to 6 related to specific embodiments of the use according to claim 1.

IX. The following documents are cited in the present decision:

D1 FR-A-2 682 596;

D2 WO-A-99/17788;

D3 FR-A-2 718 752;

D4 Derwent Publication, Week 199711 and Patent Abstracts of Japan JP-A-09002959;

A1 FR-A-2 750 298;

A3 DE-A-199 09 820;

A5 US-A-5,902,743;

A6 WO-A-98/27824;

A8 EP-A-1 034 788.

X. The submissions by the appellant (applicant), insofar as they are relevant to the present decision, can be summarized as follows:

Clarity (Article 84 EPC)

- The exposure of skin to UV irradiation could induce an immunosuppressive effect as well as an inflammatory and irritant or allergic effect. The use according to present claim 1 acted on both components of the resulting effects of UV irradiations on the skin, namely immunosuppressive effect and inflammatory/allergic effect. This twofold therapeutic effect clearly stood out from the wording of present claim 1.

Article 123(2) EPC

- Support for the terms in claim 1 "down-regulating inflammatory or allergic reaction in the skin induced by UV irradiation of the skin" and "up-regulating the immune system in the skin during an immuno-suppressive condition induced by UV irradiation of the skin" could be found in the published WO application on page 5, second paragraph and on page 6, third to fifth paragraph.

- Support for the term "ingestable (carrier)" in claim 1 could be found in claim 2 of the published WO application.

Novelty (Article 54 EPC)

- Document D1 related to cosmetic compositions acting on the skin, not to "ingestable carriers". Additionally, this document was silent with respect to possible beneficial influences on the skin subject to UV irradiation.

- Document D2 described a composition for the treatment of candidiasis and further to a method for enhancing the immune system of an animal. These were situations different from simultaneously up-regulating the immune system in the skin and down-regulating inflammatory and/or allergic reaction during an immuno-suppressive condition induced by UV irradiation of the skin.

- Document D3 pertained to compositions having an effect on the amount of sebum and on the hydration of skin and provided no information with respect to the subject-matter of claim 1.

- Document D4 referred to the use of lactobacilli as an anti-allergic agent, as shown by their capacity to reduce the IgE-production and provided no information with respect to the subject-matter of claim 1.

- Documents A1 to A8 were not relevant with respect to the subject-matter of claim 1.

Inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

- The problem underlying the present invention was to provide an agent which could reduce the skin's tendency to develop hyper-reactions and reduce the suppression of the skin's immune system, both occurring when the skin was irradiated by ultraviolet radiations.

- All the above-mentioned documents of the prior art related to solving different problems, when compared with the present invention, as none of them was concerned with alleviating the effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin.

- Therefore, neither document D3 nor anyone of documents D1, D2 or D4 gave any indication to a skilled person that the use of lactic acid bacteria might have a positive effect on the skin subjected to ultraviolet irradiation in terms of reduction of the skin's tendency to develop hyper-reactions and in terms of reduction of the suppression of the skin's immune system.

XI. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a patent be granted on the basis of the claims of the main request submitted by facsimile on 26 March 2009.

Main request

Clarity (Article 84 EPC)

1. The exposure of skin to a stress condition caused by UV irradiation may induce an immunosuppressive effect as well as an inflammatory and irritant or allergic effect (see published WO application, page 2, third paragraph). The use according to present claim 1 acts on both components of the resulting deleterious effects of UV irradiations on the skin, i.e. the immunosuppressive effect and the inflammatory or allergic effect (see published WO application; page 5, third paragraph and page 6, fifth paragraph).

This twofold therapeutic effect clearly stands out from the wording of present claim 1.

Article 123(2) EPC

2. The examining division refused the application because the wording "having the capability to stimulate the immune system" in claim 1 of the first auxiliary request filed with fax on 6 June 2005 had been found during the oral proceedings not to be acceptable for lack of compliance with the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC (see paragraph IV supra). Present claim 1 no longer includes the above wording found by the examining division to introduce added subject-matter.

The wordings in claim 1 "for down-regulating inflammatory or allergic reaction in the skin induced by UV irradiation of the skin" and "up-regulating the immune system during an immuno-suppressive condition in the skin induced by UV irradiation of the skin" are based on page 6, lines 7 to 13 of the published WO application, taken in combination with page 2, third paragraph thereof.

The feature "ingestable" has been taken from claim 2 of the published WO application.

Dependent claims 2 to 5 correspond to claims 3, 4, 8 and 9 as filed.

Dependent claim 6 is based on claim 10 as filed; the wording thereof has been adapted to present independent claim 1.

The board thus concludes that the subject matter of claim 1 and dependent claims 2 to 6 satisfies the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC.

Novelty (Article 54 EPC)

3. Claim 1 is directed to the second or further therapeutic application of probiotic lactic acid bacteria or a culture supernatant thereof given orally to a patient (cf. the term "ingestable" in claim 1), said therapeutic application being the simultaneous up-regulation of the immune system in the skin and the down-regulation of the inflammatory/allergic reaction in the skin, both caused by UV irradiation of the skin.

4. This claim is worded accordingly in the form suggested by the Enlarged Board of Appeal when considering the so-called second medical indication (see G 5/83, OJ EPO 1985, 64, point 9 of the reasons) in cases where the therapeutic agent of the claimed use is no different from a known agent.

5. The board observes that the medical application recited in present claim 1 is twofold. Hence a prerequisite for a document of the prior art to affect the novelty of the claimed subject-matter is the disclosure of both therapeutic effects.

6. The question therefore arises whether or not any of the prior art documents presently before the board directly and unambiguously discloses a relationship between, on the one hand, using the therapeutic agent (lactic acid bacteria, or supernatants thereof, given orally) and, on the other hand, obtaining the simultaneous up-regulation of the immune system in the skin after being affected by UV irradiation and the down-regulation of the inflammatory and/or allergic reaction induced by UV irradiation of the skin.

Document D1

7. Document D1 discloses a composition comprising a supernatant from Lactobacillus for the topical application on the skin for (i) scavenging active oxygen/radicals deleterious to the skin's DNA (see "Exemple expérimental 1" on page 12); for (ii) strengthening the skin DNA repair system of UV-damaged DNA (see "Exemple expérimental 2" on page 14 and lines 13 and 27 thereof); and for (iii) strengthening the skin immune system against pathogens via the increase of IgG's (see page 3, line 29; page 5, lines 1-5; page 16, line 15 and page 17, lines 8-11).

Document D2

8. This document pertains to an oral composition which includes one or more Lactobacilli probiotic microorganisms for the treatment of candidiasis, which may occur on the skin (see page 7, line 9: "epidermal"). The composition is reported to enhance the immune system in general.

Document D3

9. This document relates to an oral preparation comprising whey which has been fermented with at least one Lactobacillus, at least one Streptococcus, at least one Leuconostoc and at least one yeast, and which optionally may comprise radical scavengers such as vitamins A, E, C, B1 and superoxide dismutase (SOD). This composition is reported to enhance the immune system in general (see page 3, line 25) and to confer on the skin a more gentle and smooth aspect (see page 4, lines 9-12) via an anti-radical (scavenging) effect (see page 4, line 6).

Document D4

10. This document refers to an oral preparation comprising Lactobacilli to be used as an anti-allergic agent against type I allergic diseases such as pollinosis, allergic nasal catarrh, atopic dermatitis and bronchitis (see under "Use/Advantage").

Document A1

11. This document relates to yoghurt products for nutrition containing Lactobacilli (see claim 4), which are capable of improving a host's health and intestinal flora (see page 1, lines 18-20).

Document A3

12. It is stated in this document (see column 1, lines 23-27 that lactic acid bacteria may exert a non-specific stimulation of the immune system via the formation of IgA's (alpha-immunoglobulins) and interferon.

Document A5

13. This document discloses a Bifidobacterium strain isolate and its use as probiotic material achieving "protective health benefits" (see column 1, line 27).

Document A6

14. It is stated on page 1, third paragraph of this document that probiotic lactic acid bacteria such as CNCM 1-1225 act upon the human immune system.

Document A8

15. It is stated in paragraphs [0036] and [0049] of this document that probiotic lactic acid bacteria such as ST-11 (CNCM I-2116) exhibit anti-allergic properties in that said strain has an impact on the synthesis of different immunological mediators, leading to a good anti-Th2 profile.

16. In summary, none of these above-cited effects anticipates any of the specific therapeutic effects recited in claim 1, namely the down-regulation of inflammatory/allergic reaction in the skin and the up-regulation of immuno-suppressive condition in the skin caused UV irradiation of the skin, let alone anticipates the combination of the two effects. The board thus concludes that the subject matter of claim 1 and dependent claims 2 to 6 satisfies the requirements of Article 54 EPC.

Inventive step

Closest prior art and problem to be solved

17. The examining division considered document D3 as representing the closest prior art because it dealt with lactic acid bacteria having an effect against radicals on the skin (see the "Minutes of the oral proceedings", paragraph 18). However, given that the claimed subject-matter deals with alleviating UV skin's damages, the board agrees with the appellant's view that a document concerned with alleviating the effects of UV on the skin would represent the best starting point.

One such document is indeed before the board since document D1 describes inter alia (see point 7 supra) the use of a composition comprising a supernatant from Lactobacillus for the topical application on the skin for strengthening the skin DNA repair system of UV-damaged DNA (see "Exemple expérimental 2" on page 14 and lines 13 and 27 thereof in combination with page 3, lines 6-10). Document D1 thus represents the closest prior art.

18. The problem to be solved in view of the closest prior art is the provision of an agent capable of reducing further damages, in addition to DNA damages (document D1), occurring to the skin irradiated by UV light, namely the skin's tendency to develop both hyper-reactions and immuno-suppression (see the WO application, page 2, third paragraph and page 3, lines 19-21).

19. The solution to this problem according the invention is the oral administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria or culture supernatants thereof. Example 1 of the application shows that the probiotic lactic acid bacterium ST-11 (CNCM I-2116) or a culture supernatant thereof taken orally indeed achieves a reduction (see Table I) of the inflammation induced by dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) to mice ears, which is a model for measuring the level of an hypersensitivity reaction occurring in the skin. The levels of ICAM-1, IL-10 (pro-inflammatory markers) and TGF-beta (anti-inflammatory marker) are also measured and the levels of these markers confirm the results of the "ear thickness test". Example 2 further shows that UV-light induced suppression of the immune response in the animals' skin is restored by oral administration to the animals of probiotic lactic acid bacteria or culture supernatants thereof (see Table V). The board is thus satisfied that the above-formulated problem has indeed been solved.

Has the problem been solved within the whole range of claim 1?

20. Compared with claim 1 accepted by the examining division (see paragraph II supra), claim 1 of this request is no longer restricted to the exemplified lactic acid bacteria strains CNCM I-1225 (see Example 1) and CNCM I-2116 (see Example 2), or a culture supernatant thereof.

21. Relying on decision T 939/92 (OJ EPO 1996, 309), the examining division reasoned that a broader claim referring to any lactic acid bacteria strain or a culture supernatant thereof (such as present claim 1) was not allowable under Article 56 EPC because it would cover bacterial strains failing to exhibit the required biological effect and hence failing to solve any problem (see communication dated 23 February 2005, paragraph 4.1).

22. However, the board cannot endorse this argumentation. The board regards the principle underlying decision T 939/92 as being that, for the presence of an inventive step to be acknowledged, the purpose according to the invention of all the subject-matter falling within a claim must be plausibly achieved. Although decision T 939/92 was based on a product claim, the rationale of this decision can, in the board's view, also be applied to the present case, where a second medical use is at stake (see point 4 supra). Once the rationale of decision T 939/92 is applied to the present second medical use claim 1, addressing the oral administration of lactic bacterial for the treatment of inflammatory/allergic reaction and immuno-suppressive conditions in the skin caused by the UV irradiation of the skin (see also the problem formulated in point 18 supra), the only question that could arise in connection with the argument put forward by the examining division is therefore whether, by analogy with the principles set out in T 939/92, all the lactic acid bacterial strains or culture supernatants thereof referred to in the claim are suitable for the above defined skin treatment.

23. However, this question does not arise, because, unlike the product claim underlying the cited decision, the statement of purpose ("...for preparing an ingestable carrier for down-regulating inflammatory or allergic reaction in the skin induced by UV irradiation of the skin and up-regulating the immune system in the skin during an immuno-suppressive condition induced by UV irradiation of the skin") in the present second medical use claim is an explicit feature of the claim that has a limiting effect (see decision T 435/04 of 13 March 2007, points 29 to 31 of the reasons). Therefore, present claim 1 only refers to those lactic acid bacterial strains or culture supernatants thereof with which the above-mentioned skin diseases caused by UV irradiation can actually be treated successfully. In conclusion, the fact that an ineffective lactic acid bacterial strain might theoretically fall within the frame of present claim 1 does not provide a basis for an attack according to the principles formulated in decision T 939/92.

24. When assessing the inventive step, the question arises whether or not the skilled person would have derived the solution of the above-formulated problem in an obvious way from the closest prior art document D1 on its own, or from document D1 taken in combination with other documents of the prior art.

25. The in vitro experiments described in "Exemple expérimental 2" on page 14 of document D1 deal with measuring the number of thymine dimers formed by UV irradiation and reflecting DNA damage. Therefore, in the board's judgement, this test pertaining to skin DNA repair is predictive neither of the down-regulation of the inflammatory/allergic reaction in the UV irradiated skin, nor of the up-regulation of the immuno-suppressive condition in the UV irradiated skin. Moreover, it should be noted that the lactic acid bacteria-based agent described in document D1 is applied topically, whereas the agent referred to in present claim 1 is an "ingestable carrier".

26. Therefore, in view of the above differences, the board concludes that the skilled person would derive from document D1 nothing more than the teaching that lactic acid bacteria applied topically to the skin are able to strengthen the skin repair system of UV-damaged DNA, and would not draw any conclusion as to a possible reduction of further damages occurring to the skin irradiated by UV light, namely the skin's tendency to develop both hyper-reactions and immuno-suppression. This is even more true once the skilled person realises that the agent according to the invention is taken orally rather than applied topically according to document D1.

27. The board observes that document D1 also refers to a further technical effect, namely the strengthening of the skin immune system against pathogens (see page 3, line 29; page 5, lines 1-5 and page 17, lines 8-11). The question thus arises whether the knowledge of this additional effect would partially direct the skilled person towards the present invention, at least insofar as the "immunological arm" is concerned. However, this therapeutic effect directed against pathogens is not predictive of the up-regulation of the immuno-suppressive condition in the skin caused by UV irradiation of the skin, given the different aetiology underlying these two pathological situations, as reflected by the divergence between the test used in document D1 (measure of IgG's: see page 16, line 15) and that used in the present application (measure of % inhibition of HSC by irradiation: see Table V).

28. The board further observes that documents D2, D3, A3 and A6 teach that lactic acid bacteria behave as enhancers of the immune response, whereas documents D4 and A8 relate to the anti-allergic properties thereof. The question thus also arises whether or not the skilled person would have derived the solution of the above-formulated problem in an obvious way from document D1 taken in combination with one or more of these documents.

29. Document D2 pertains to an oral composition which includes one or more Lactobacilli probiotic microorganisms for enhancing the immune system during the treatment of candidiasis, which may occur on the skin (see page 7, line 9: "epidermal"). Document D3 teaches that a composition comprising lactic acid bacteria enhances the immune system in general (see page 3, line 26) via the activation of PKC (protein kinase C: see page 24, lines 22-25). Document A3 (see column 1, lines 23-27) teaches that lactic acid bacteria may exert a non-specific stimulation of the immune system via the formation of IgA's (alpha-immunoglobulins) and interferon. Document A6 (see page 1, third paragraph) teaches that probiotic lactic acid bacteria such as CNCM 1-1225 act upon the human immune system. Document D4 is concerned with treating with lactic acid bacteria a series of type I allergic pathologies including atopic dermatitis. Finally, document A8 states in paragraphs [0036] and [0049] that probiotic lactic acid bacteria such as ST-11 (CNCM I-2116) exhibit anti-allergic properties in that said strain has an impact on the synthesis of different immunological mediators, leading to a good anti-Th2 profile.

30. Combining the teaching of document D1 with that of one or more of these documents, in the board's opinion, would not lead the skilled person to an obvious solution of the above-defined problem, either. This is because, as already emphasized under point 27 supra, the therapeutic effects and the underlying experiments, if any, disclosed in the above documents are predictive neither of the up-regulation of the immuno-suppressive condition in the skin caused by UV irradiation of the skin, nor of the down-regulation of the UV-irradiated skin's tendency to develop hyper-reactions. In fact, the knowledge that lactic acid bacteria stimulate the immune response against candidiasis (document D2), or that they are able to increase PKC (document D3) or IgA's (document A3) in vitro would not lead the skilled person to the unavoidable conclusion that up-regulation of the immuno-suppressive condition in the skin caused by UV irradiation will turn up. Nor would the knowledge by the skilled person that lactic acid bacteria are able to alleviate a series of type I allergic pathologies including atopic dermatitis (document D4) or that they have an impact in vitro on the synthesis of different immunological mediators, leading to a good anti-Th2 profile (document A8) allow any reasonable prediction to be formulated as regards the down-regulation of the UV-irradiated skin's tendency to develop hyper-reactions.

31. In view of the foregoing, the board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 and dependent claims 2 to 6 satisfies the requirements of Article 56 EPC.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside

2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to grant a patent on the basis of the claims of the main request submitted by facsimile on 26 March 2009 and a description to be adapted.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility